...excavations made after the construction of the highway, but in its decision In the same case, upon the rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial (State v. Society etc., 44 NJL 502), held that the doctrine was not applicable in the case of a highway...

...verdict having been found for the defendant, Sir F. Pollock, on a former day in this Term, moved for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, on the ground that the evidence had been improperly rejected : Where an attorney is employed merely...

...defendants ; and the Court of CP, approving of the direction of the CJ at Nisi Prius, afterwards discharged a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial.1 C. BARNARD AND OTHERS v. J. ADAMS AND OTHERS. IN THE SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES, DECEMBER...

...then present, " Yes, I do." The jury having returned a verdict for the plaintiff, the court granted a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, on a suggestion that the learned judge ought to have left it as a question to the jury whether the...

...having found a verdict for the plaintiff as for a total loss, the defendant, in this term, obtained a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial. On the day for showing cause, Lord MANSFIELD, after reporting the facts as above related, and that...

...Judge, however, reserved the point of law if the defendant thought fit to move the Court. Afterwards a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial was obtained on the ground of a misdirection, because the Judge told the jury that so long an enjoyment...

...was admitted, and the point in like manner reserved. On the return of the postea, Bradford obtained a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, and at April term 1791, the cause was argued. Bradford, for the defendant, contended, that the evidence...

...subsequent case (ft), where the owner of a house had prevented the plaintiff, who held under a lease for years, from disposing of the remainder of his...be a new trial. Lord Ellenborough, CJ, observing, that " The circumstances of the defendant's title and interest may rebut the implication of malice...

...scientific evidence of a conflicting nature, as to whether that mineral was coal or not. A motion for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, on the ground that a new trial was essential for the justice of the case, although the verdict was...

...court held that the defendant was still liable upon it. But the decision took place merely on refusing a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial. It seems to have proceeded on the ground that, as the new surety could not be liable on the note by...