 | William Johnson, New York (State). Supreme Court - 1859 - 512 páginas
...whether a decree in the Court of Chancery would be reversed on an appeal to the House of Lords ; and upon a rule to show . cause why there should not be a new trial, among the objections stated by the defendants, one was, that the previous proceedings in the House... | |
 | 1859 - 972 páginas
...— damages £140. In a preceding term the Attorney-General obtained, on the part of the defendant, a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, on the ground that there was no evidence to go to the jury ; secondly, that if there was, the verdict... | |
 | Owen Davies Tudor - 1860 - 934 páginas
...an action for money had and received against the Bank. Lord Mansfield directed a nonsuit ; but upon a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, and cause shown, Lord Mansfield, Willes and Ashurst, JJ., thought the indorsement restrictive, and... | |
 | George Caines - 1860 - 604 páginas
...The *judgment of the court is, that the defendants take [*134] nothing by their motion, and that the rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, be discharged with costs. New trial denied. NB In another action on the freight of the same vessel,... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1864 - 614 páginas
...The jury found he entered under a new agreement, and there was a verdict for the plaintiff. The court refused a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial. If this case was rightly decided, it follows that it is wholly immaterial whether there is an outstanding... | |
 | 1864 - 878 páginas
...Exchequer, on November 5th, before Lord Chief Baron Pollock and Barons Bramwell, Chanwell and Pigott, for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial on the ground of misdirection by the learned judge, and also on the ground that the verdict was •gainst... | |
 | Patrick Shaw - 1864 - 648 páginas
...confinement in a lunatic asylum, the verdict was for the defenders. Circumstances in which a motion For a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, on the ground of the verdict being contrary to evidence, refused. Mackintosh v Fraser, Jan. 20, 1860;... | |
 | 1864 - 726 páginas
...instant the attorney general (with whom were the solicitor general and Mr. Thomas Jones) moved for a rule to s'how cause why there should not be a new trial on the ground of misdirection of the learned judge, aud also on the ground that the verdict was against... | |
 | New York (State). Court of Appeals, George Franklin Comstock, Henry Rogers Selden, Francis Kernan, Erasmus Peshine Smith, Joel Tiffany, Edward Jordan Dimock, Samuel Hand, Hiram Edward Sickels, Louis J. Rezzemini, Edmund Hamilton Smith, Edwin Augustus Bedell, Alvah S. Newcomb, James Newton Fiero - 1864 - 674 páginas
...whether they would confine themselves to the pecuniary loss. The jury gave the plaintiff -£4000. On a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial for misdirection, the Court of Queen's Bench held that by the true construction of this act, damages... | |
 | Alexandra, vessel - 1864 - 618 páginas
...by the Crown for a violation of the Foreign Enlistment Act, I have humbly to move your Lordships for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new trial, on the ground of misdirection by the learned Judge, and also upon the ground that the verdict was against... | |
| |
Pigott, for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new... 
