...Reprint, 721, in speaking of the right of the owner of property to follow the proceeds thereof in equity: "It makes no difference, in reason or law, into what...money which was produced by the sale of the goods of the principal, as in Scott v. Surman, Willes, Rep. 400, 125 Eng. Reprint, 1235, 9r into other merchandise,...

...purchases a carriage '"with that money, then B is entitled to the carriage.' And, " indeed, if he is not so entitled, the case on the part of the " defendant...money which was produced by the sale of the goods " of the principal, as in Scott v. Suivnu.m, Willis 400, or into " other merchandise, as in Whitecomb v....

...his by substitution for the money. On the issue of identification, Lord Ellenborough, CJ, said this: 'It makes no difference in reason or law into what...money which was produced by the sale of the goods of the principal, as in Scott v. Surman, or into other merchandise, as in Whitecomb v. Jacob 4 for the...

...which continue to have considerable relevance today: "It makes no difference in reason or law into what form, different from the original, the change may...money which was produced by the sale of the goods of the principal, as in Scott v Surman [1742] Willes 400, or into other merchandise, as in Whitcomb v...

...property, for it had belonged to him: Lord Ellenborough CJ: It makes no difference in reason or in law into what other form, different from the original, the change may have been made ... for the product of or substitute for the original thing still follows the nature of the thing itself,...

...of trust can confer no rights on the party abusing it, nor on those in privity with him." Again : " It makes no difference, in reason or law, into what...money which was produced by the sale of the goods of the principal, as in Scott v. Surman, Willes, 400, or into other merchandise, as in Whitecombe v. Jacob,...