...be such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process? It is not by the office of the person to whom the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined. "Where the head of a department acts in a case in which executive discretion is to be exercised; in...

...Governor. For example, it was said, inter alia, by the Court: "It is not by the office of the pen-on to whom the writ is directed, but the nature of the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined :" p. 170. There are other expressions, indicating that there was no purpose to express an opinion...

...Hatch, 33 111. 9; Marbury v. Madison, 1 Crane h, 170. In the latter case the chief justice declared: "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...done, that the propriety or impropriety of Issuing a mandfimiis is to be determined. Where the head of a department acts in a case in which executive discretion...

...such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process ? " It is not by the office of the person to whom the...directed, but the nature of the thing to be done that the rarely exercised.1 In accordance with this same principle, that is, distinguishing between official...

...such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process ? " It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but the officers peculiarly irksome, as well as nature of the thing to be done that the M to Jurisdiction....

...be such a case as would, were any other individual the party complained of, authorize the process?" "It is not by the office of the person to whom the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined." In the case of Sutherland vs. Governor, 29 Mich., 320, Mr. Justice Cooley of the Supreme Court of this...

...United States, declared: "It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined." Notwithstanding this proposition has been characterized as <>l'!t,-r, it has served as the text for...

...delivered many years ago, Chief Justice Marshall of the supreme court of the United states declared : "It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to...

...delivered many years ago, Chief Justice Marshall, of the supreme court of the United States, declared: "It is not by the office of the person to whom the writ is directed, but by the nature of the thing to be done, that the propriety or impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to...

...executive, legislative, or judicial. In Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 170, Chief-Justice Marshall said : ' It is not by the office of the person to whom the...impropriety of issuing a mandamus is to be determined.' " The constitutional provision declaring that ' the supreme executive power of this state shall be...