 ... even where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first, and embraces new provisions, plainly showing that it was intended as a substitute for the first act, it will operate as a repeal of...  The York Legal Record - Página 1251893Vista completa - Acerca de este libro
 | United States. General Accounting Office - 1949 - 888 páginas
...where the two statutes are not repugnant in every respect, if the later statute covers the whole field of the first and embraces new provisions, plainly showing that it was intended is a substitute for the first statute, it will operate as a repeal of the earlier statute. United States... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations - 1951 - 1706 páginas
..."if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first, and embraces new provisions, plainlyshowing that it was intended as a substitute for the first act, it will operate as a repeal of that act" ( United States v. Tynen, 11 Wall. 88). The standard treatise on statutory construction quotes the... | |
 | Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell - 1915 - 972 páginas
...and even when the two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet, if the later act covers the whole subject of the first and embraces new provisions, plainly showing that it was a substitute for the first act, it will operate as a repeal of that act. Section 459, of Kentucky Statutes,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1903 - 1410 páginas
...not in express terms répugnant, yet, if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first, ixnd embraces new provisions, plainly showing that it was...first act, it will operate as a repeal of that act." This principle plaintiff in error relies on, and urges that it was recently asserted and applied in... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1920 - 1138 páginas
...the first. 3 Where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet if the later Act covers the whole subject of the first, and embraces new provisions, plainly showing that It was Intended as a substiNOTB.— A» tn construction of statute, according to purpose for which it wat passai, see not«... | |
 | 1911 - 496 páginas
...construction that where two acts aixnot in express terms repugnant, yet, if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first and embraces new provisions plainly showing that it was intended as a substitute of the first act, it will act a< a repeal of the first act. For this reason in so far as it defines... | |
 | 1911 - 500 páginas
...is -that where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet, if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first and embraces new provisions plainly showing that it was intended as a substitute of the first act, it will act as a repeal of the first and especially so where the subsequent act contains... | |
 | 1913 - 1228 páginas
...the first. Where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet if the later act covers the whole subject of the first, and embraces new provisions,...showing that It was intended as a substitute for the flrst act, it will operate as a repeal of that act." I5ut a careful examination of these statutes fails... | |
 | Francis Dunham Wormuth, Edwin Brown Firmage - 1989 - 380 páginas
...where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet if the latter act covers the whole subject of the first act, it will operate as a repeal of that act."* The most famous statement on the question is that of Justice Holmes. A statute may indicate or require... | |
 | 1928 - 1056 páginas
..."And even where two acts are not in express terms repugnant, yet if the latter net covers the whole subject of the first, and embraces new provisions,...first act, it will operate as a repeal of that act." And our own court in Wood v. Bateman. 149 La. 290, as So. 824, said: "The act thus quoted, being independent... | |
| |
