 | Woodrow Wilson - 1918 - 382 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | William MacDonald - 1920 - 682 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided...its favor. Prior to the present Congress, therefore, r the precedents drawn from that source were equal. If we resort to the States, the expressions of... | |
 | Samuel Gordon Heiskell - 1921 - 852 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. "If the opinion of the... | |
 | Stuart Lewis - 1928 - 720 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me. If the opinion of the... | |
 | William MacDonald - 1926 - 742 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided in its favor. Prior to the present Congress, therefore,istitu:t the**! ids it, p uty of :j — the precedents drawn from that source were equal.... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1963 - 548 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank ; another, in 1816, decided...the bank have been probably to those in its favor as 4 to 1. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1963 - 716 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank ; another, in 1816, decided...the bank have been probably to those in its favor as 4 to 1. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which, if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh... | |
 | Abraham Lincoln - 1989 - 946 páginas
...Congress in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another in 1811, decided against it. One Congress in 1815 decided against a bank; another in 1816 decided in...one. There is nothing in precedent, therefore, which if its authority were admitted, ought to weigh in favor of the act before me." I drop the quotations... | |
 | James Willard Hurst - 2001 - 392 páginas
...Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank; another, in 1816, decided in its favor," and concluded that "prior to the present Congress, therefore, the precedents drawn from that source were equal." Richardson, 2:576, 582. This argument had been anticipated by Judge Spencer Roane in his "Hampden"... | |
 | Joseph Hartwell Barrett - 2006 - 896 páginas
...Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another in 1811, decided against it. One Congress, in 1815, decided against a bank ; another in 1816, decided...favor. Prior to the present Congress, therefore, the prec*dents drawn from that source were equal. If we resort to the States the expressions of legislative,... | |
| |
... acquiescence of the people and the states can be considered as well settled. So far from this being the case on this subject, an argument against the bank might be based on precedent. One Congress, in 1791, decided in favor of a bank; another, in... 
