...Justice Taney said that the President's "duty and his power are purely military. As Commander in Chief, he is authorized to direct the movements of the naval...employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy." 15 Despite the broader conception of the Commander in Chief...

...President by the declaration of war. His duty and his power are purely military; as Commander in Chief he is authorized to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed at his command, and to employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and...

...Confederacy . . ." 3 "His [the President's] duty and his power are purely military. As commander-inchief, he is authorized to direct the movements of the naval...employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy." 4 The Department of Defense, the successor agency to the...

...duty belong to the President as commander-in-chief . " (emphasis supplied) "As commander-in-chief, he is authorized to direct the movements of the naval...employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy." (Fleming v. Page, 50 US (9 How.) 603, 615 [1850]). During...

...Supreme Court stated: (The President's] duty and his power are purely military. As Commander-in-chief, he is authorized to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed by law at hi* command, aad to employ them in the IM«HM» he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and...

...stated: [The President's) duty and hia power are purely military. Aa commander-in-chief, he la authorised to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed by law at his command, aad to employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and lubdue the enemy....

...military. As Commander-in-chief, he is authorized to direct the movementa of the naval and military forcea placed by law at his command, and to employ them in the manner ha may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and subdue the enemy. Id at 615. In a more recent...

...by a single band. According to Chief Justice Roger Taney, "As oonmander-in-chief, he [the President] is authorized to direct the movements of the naval and military forces placed in his command, and to employ diem in the manner he may deem most effectual to harass and conquer and...

...region"); Fleming v. Page, 50 US (9 How.) 603, 615 (1850) ("As commander-in-chief, [the President] is authorized to direct the movements of the naval...employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual"); Loving v. United States, 517 US 748, 776 (1996) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment)...

...the move- Powers of ments of the naval and military forces placed by law at his command, "entas^omand to employ them in the manner he may deem most effectual to har- mander-inass and conquer and subdue the enemy. He may invade the hostile Chief to country, and...