...Christianity be a part of ihe common law of the Stale, yet it is so in this qualified sense, that its di\ine origin and truth are admitted, and therefore it is...against, to the annoyance of believers or the injury of ihe public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Undtgraph v. The Commonwealth...

...believed in Christianity or not, and whether they were Jews or infidels. So that we are compelled to admit that although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the supreme court of Pennsylvania in Updegraph v. Com., 11 Serg. & R. 394":...

...compelled to admit, that although Christianity be a part of the Common Law of the State (of Pennsylvania), yet it is so in this qualified sense, that its divine...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public." In every State of the Union religious liberty is secured in the several constitutions among the inalienable...

...are compelled to admit that, although Christianity be part of the common law of the State, yet it is in this qualified sense : that its divine origin and...annoyance of believers, or the injury of the public." i In the case of Andrew -vs. The New York Bible and Prayer Book Society, the Court speaks as follows...

...law, as being subversive of the doctrines of Christianity, Story, J., delivering the opinion, said: " Although Christianity be a part of the common law...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public." See the title BLASPHEMY AND PROFANITY, vol. 4, p. 580. 2. Reg. v. Millis, 10 Cl. & F. 671; Catterall...

...said that, " although Christianity be a part of the common law of the State, yet it is only so in the qualified sense, that its divine origin and truth...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public." l The " divine origin and truth " of the Christian religion are not admitted by the common law of this...

...believed in Christianity or not, and whether they were Jews or infidels. So that we are compelled to admit that although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Updegraff v. The Commonwealth (1 1 Serg....

...and in connection with the Bill of Rights of that state, as found in its Constitution of government. Although Christianity be a part of the common law...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Vidal v. Girard's Ex'rs, 43 US (2 How.) 127, 198, 11 L. Ed. 205; Specht v. Commonwealth, 8 Pa. 312,...

...a part of the common law of the state in a qualified sense —that is, its divine origin and birth are admitted; and, therefore, it is not to be maliciously...and blasphemed against to the annoyance of believers asd the injury of the public." — Vidal v. Oirarff's-Exec., 2 How. 127. A Jew has no constitutional...

...believed in Christianity or not, and whether they were Jews or infidels. So that we are compelled to admit that although Christianity be a part of the common...annoyance of believers or the injury of the public. Such was the doctrine of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in Updegraff v. The Commonwealth (11 Serg....