...perform it without any default in him, and halb no remedy over, theu law will excuse him, but when the party by his own contract creates a duty or charge upon himself he is bound to make it good if he muy, notwithstanding any accident by inevitable necessity, because he might have provided against it...

...(Paradyne v. Jane, Aleyn's Rep. 26.) This case shows that where a person has by his own contract created a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good if he can ; notwithstanding any accident or inevitable necessity, because he might have provided against...

...the sanctity of contracts require parties to do what they have agreed to do; and when a party, by his contract, creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it, good. We are sustained in our contention by the following cases: Paducah Lumber Co. v. Paducah Water Supply...

...v. Jane, I ii47, Aleyn, 2'i, in which "the original rule of English law was clear in its insistence, that where a party by his own contract creates a duty...or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good notwithstanding any accident by inevitable necessity, because he might have provided against it by...

...without any default in himself, and he has no remedy over, then the law will excuse him; but where the party by his own contract creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, notwithstanding any accident or delay by inevitable necessity.'' This rule is supported by a number...

...Co., Irish Rep., 4 Com. Law, 204. This case was held to come within the rule that, when a party by his contract creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, because it is his own voluntary contract ; although where the law imposes such a duty, and the party...

...Co., Irish Rep., 4 Com. Law, 204. This case was held to come within tho rule that, when a party by his contract creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, because it is his own voluntary contract; although where the law imposes such a duty, and tho party...

...seems to be based on the principle that when once a man "has by his own contract • • • created a duty or charge upon himself he is bound to make it good notwithstanding any accident by Inevitable necessity, because be might have provided against it in...

...same be destroyed by a tempest or enemies, the lessee will be excused ; but where the party, by hie own contract, creates a duty or charge upon himself, he is bound to make it good, notwithstanding any accident by inevitable neoesSteele v. Buck. sity, because lie might have provided...

...tenant will not be relieved from this obltgation even in equity. Holtzopffel v. Baker, 18 Ves. 115. by his own contract creates a duty or charge upon...bound to make it good if he may, notwithstanding any accidental or inevitable necessity, because he might have provided for it in his contract ; and, therefore,...