Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

It is a fingular circumftance in the ecclefiaftical hiftory of this country, that in proportion as a man lofes all fenfe of religion and becomes immoral, he fees before him a better prospect of enjoying all the privileges of the eftablished church.'

How far prejudice may have dictated the following remark, we pretend not to determine: I never (fays this Writer) knew an inftance in which a conviction of the errors of Popery has made one profelyte. They become Proteftants as foon as they ceafe almost to be Chriftians. It must furely be a bad arrangement, which thus exposes to oppreffion the fincere and the virtuous, and which opens to the vicious and diffipated man the road of eafe, of honour, and of preferment!'

Under the article of Priests, the Author informs us, ⚫ that by an arrangement which took place in the reign of James II. England was divided into 4 diftricts, and a bishop was appointed to prefide over each. They had then 1000l. per annum fettled on each of them out of the exchequer; but this only continued till the Revolution, when they were reduced to the neceffity of fupporting themfelves by the best means in their power. Since that time the fame regulation with regard to numbers has continued; and as they have no particular place of refidence allotted, each bishop generally chufes to live in the most centrical and convenient fituation. Their office is to attend the fmall concerns of their respective diftricts; to administer the facrament of confirmation, to provide the different congregations with priests, and to take care that thefe perform their duties, and behave in a manner becoming the character of churchmen-One hundred pounds per ann. is more than equal to the revenue of their epifcopal fee!

As far as I can rely on my information, which I think is accurate, the number of priests now employed is about 360. Their diftribution is as follows: In the northern diftrict, which takes in the counties of Northumberland, Cumberland, Weftmoreland, Durham, York, Lancaster, and Chefter, there are about 167. Of thefe, 48 are Ex- Jefuits. Three places are now vacant. This district contains the greatest number of priefts, and alfo the greatest number of Catholics ; but not in proportion to the number of clergy, many being private chaplains to gentlemen, where there are no congregations. Since their diffolution, nine places have been given up by the Ex-Jefuits, two of which are not likely ever to be revived.

In the mid-land diftricts are about 90 priefts; 28 of which are Ex-Jefuits. There are now 14 places vacant. This district declines very faft, as appears from the great number of congregations now without priefs. Most of them have been vacant for fome time; and no clergymen unengaged have hitherto been found to fupply them. It may be noticed, that this district, though compofed of the greatest number of counties, and thofe moftly large, to the amount of 16, contains only 8,460 Catholics, which is computed to be about two thirds of what there were about 30 or 40 years ago.

The weitern diftri&t contains about 44 parishes; 23 are ExJefuits. There is one place vacant, and has been fo for fome time, This district is the thinneft of Catholics of any in England, though

its extent is great, It contains eight English counties, and the whole of N. and S. Wales.

The London diftrict, comprising nine counties, has 58 priefts; 11 are Ex-Jefuits. There are five places vacant. This district hath alfo diminished, and is declining very fast.

These priests, whofe number and distribution I have given, either live as chaplains in the families of Gentlemen, and have the care of the little congregations around them; or elfe, they refide in towns, or in fome country-places, where funds have been fettled for their fupport. The chapels are in their own houses. Twenty pounds

per ann. is thought a very handsome salary for a Gentleman's chaplain; and if the rural curate hath twenty more to keep himself, his horfe, and his fervant, it will be faid that he is very well provided. Some may have small annuities from their own families; but this is not common. Our priests in their general character are upright and fincere: but narrowed by a bad education, they contract early prejudices, which they very feldom afterward depofite. The theological lumber of the fchools fupplies, in their minds, the place of more ufeful furniture.'

[ocr errors]

With refpect to the Popish Schools in England, the Author avers, that it is a real fact, that the Catholics have not opened one new fchool, fince the year 1778. The whole number of those which we have, are I think but three; at least thofe of any note. There is one in Hertfordshire, one near Birmingham, and a third near Wolverhampton in Staffordshire. In London are fome day-schools; and in other parts may be perhaps fome little eftablishments where an old woman gives lectures on the Horn book, and the art of fpelling. At the first mentioned fchools, are generally about twenty or thirty boys, who have them about the age of twelve or fourteen, That in Staffordshire is far the most numerous; its defign is to give some education to children of a lower clafs: they learn their religion, and fuch other things as may qualify them for trade, and the ufual business of life When it can be avoided, they never admit Protettan:s, from an apprehenfion that it might give offence; as alfo from a well-grounded fatpicion, that it would lead gradually to weaken the religious principles of the Catholic boys.'

On the fubject of the foreign Schools for English Catholics, the Author remarks that in the year 1568, Dr Allan, afterwards Cardinal, founded a college for the English at Doway, a town in Flanders, then fubject to the Spanish King; and in procefs of time, other colleges and places of education were established in France, Spain, and Portugal.....he college of Doway is molt confiderable, and is governed by a Prefident, and other superiors, all of the English nation. It be longs to the fecular clergy; and the number of students is generally above 100. The revenue of this college is very moderate, and the penfion which provides every thing is but 201. per annum.

The clergy have alfo other feminaries of inferior diflinction at Paris, at Valadolid, in old Callile, at Rome, and at Lisbon, The number of ludents at these places is confiderable..... While the Jefui:s stood, St. Oner was their great fchool for claffical improvements, and they fupplied England with many able and active churchinen. At the expulfion of that body from France, their college was given to D44

the

the Clergy at Doway, in whofe hands it now is, but it anfwers little purpose. The Jefuits themselves first retired to Bruges, in the Auftrian Netherlands, where they opened another college; but at their total fuppreffion a few years after, that houfe was diffolved, together with every other foundation they poffeffed. They then erected an academy at Liege (for their spirit of enterprize was not to be broken) under the protection of the Bishop, and Prince of that place. They are now no longer Jefuits; but their academy is in great eftimation, and the children of our Catholic gentry principally refort thither for education. However as their object is not to form churchmen (for they think the Church has ufed them ill) but to inftruct youth in the fashionable arts of polished life, the order of Aaron will receive little affiftance from their labours.'

The Monks of the order of St. Benedict have alfo houses abroad, and their priests come to England. The Friars of St. Francis's order have likewife a college at Doway, which fupplies fome priefs. Within these few years they have greatly decreased, owing to the wife regulations France has adopted, for the reduction of religious orders; as alfo because the true fpirit of Friarifm is much abated.... There is also a third order which now begins rather to encrease. The. Dominicans fince the fuppreffion of the Jefuits have grown into more visible form: they have a school near Bruffels, and a small convent at Lorrain, in the Auftrian territories. Some priests of this order are likewife in England.

At this day the English Nunneries abroad are no less than twentyone. France and the Low Countries have almoft the whole number. It is incredible how they have here been able to fupport themselves; for though in many houfes their numbers are very thin, yet they go on braving all the ftorms of adverfe fortune!'

On this fubject the Author, in a ftrain partaking of ferious reafoning, and lively raillery, obferves, that though he is fenfible that no mode of education can be lefs adapted to improve the mind, and to inftil fuch principles as may form it to the business of life, yet fo it, happens, that few ladies have higher pretenfions to the palm of female perfection than have many of the Catholic perfuafion. The. Public knows the truth of this obfervation. A difplay of their characters would I fear offend their modefty, otherwife I would fay as wives, as mothers, as citizens, and as Chriftians, they ftand unrival. led. One is fometimes tempted to fufpect, that in moulding the foft texture of their minds, nature, too kindly partial, threw in fome elements, which otherwife might have fallen to the share of their hus bands.'

On the whole we have received much information, and much entertainment from the perufal of this work. As it was the Author's principal defign to convince the Public that neither the church nor the ftate have any thing to fear from the English Catholics, he hath brought forward every fpecies of materials which his fources of information could fupply. I have defcribed (fays he) the Catholics as they really are, and from this defcription, if it be not evident to the weakest fight, that all is fecure, there must be a timidity in Englithmen, that will shudder at the moft feeble fuggeftions of fancy.'

ART. II. Letters to a Philofophical Unbeliever. Part I. Containing an Examination of the principal Objections to the Doctrines of Natural Religion; and especially thofe contained in the Writings of Mr. HUME. By Jofeph Priestley, LL. D. F. R. S. 8vo. 3. Johnfon.

HESE Letters are, or may be supposed to be, addreffed

to a traveller of an ingenuous difpofition; who has had his mind unhinged, with refpect to the first principles of natural as well as revealed religion, in confequence of the books he has lately read, and the company he has been obliged to keep. The Author therefore here attempts to give him all the fatisfaction he is able, towards the folution of the difficulties that have been propofed to him on these subjects; confining himself however folely to the arguments which prove the being, and the moral attributes, of a Deity.

In the first letter, the Author treats of the nature of evidence in general; and, in the fecond, of the direct evidence for the belief of a God; which is founded on a conclufion, the juftice of which must be acknowledged by every reafoning Being; viz. that all effects have their adequate caufes, or nothing begins to exift without a caufe. And as a table or chair, for inftance, must not only have had a caufe, but likewife a defigning caufe, capable of comprehending their nature and ufes; fo the man that conftructed them muft likewife have had a defigning caufe, and a caufe, or author, capable of comprehending all his powers and properties, of which he himfelf has only a partial incomplete knowledge, acquired by experience and ftudy. Should it even be allowed, fays the Author, that the human fpecies had no beginning, it would not follow that it could be the cause of itself, or that it had no caufe; for the idea of a caufe of any thing implies not only fomething prior to itself, or at least cotemporary with itself, but fomething capable at leaft of comprehending what it produces; and our going back ever so far in the generations of men or animals, brings us no nearer to the leaft degree of fatisfaction on the fubject. After thinking in this train ever fo long, we find we might juft as well fuppofe that any individual man now living was the firft, and without caufe, as either any of his anceftors, or the fpecies itself."

The Author next proceeds to the confideration of the principal difficulties that have been started on this fubject; and fatisfactorily refutes the objections that have been urged against the belief of a Deity. On this head he obferves, that it is of no avail to say that we cannot conceive the original existence of such a being as the Deity; for our having no idea at all of a thing does not imply an impoffibility or contradiction; but arifes merely from the limited nature of our faculties. This is mere ignorance, and an ignorance which we can never overcome, In this cafe,

there

there is only a difficulty of conceiving, but nothing contrary to our experience; which relates only to finite fubftances, that require a caufe. We may be dazzled and astonished at the idea of an uncaufed being, but at the fame time we are compelled to believe in the existence of an original caufe of all things; as an hypothesis abfolutely neceffary to be affumed, in order to account for evident facts.

The Author next demonftrates the neceffary attributes of the Supreme Being, particularly his omniprefence; as neceffarily following from his neceffary existence. While we admit that no power can act but where it is, it follows that God muft be prefent to all his works, and exift even through the boundless extent of infinite space: an idea juft as incomprehenfible as his neceffary existence, but not more fo.'-After this, adds the Author, the probability will be, that his works, as well as himself, occupy the whole extent of fpace, infinite as it must neceffarily be; and that as he could have had no beginning, so neither had his works.'

[ocr errors]

In fupport of this last opinion, the Author obferves that we cannot poffibly reconcile ourselves to the idea that a being, infinitely intelligent and powerful, fhould remain inactive a whole eternity; which must have been the cafe, if the creation had any beginning at all. An eternal creation, being the act of an eternal Being, is not at all more incomprehenfible than the eternal existence of that Being himself. Both are incomprehenfible; but the one is the most natural confequence of the other. In fact, there is no greater objection to the fuppofition of the creation having been eternal, than to duration itself having been eternal; for there cannot be any affignable or imaginable period in duration, in which the creation might not have taken place. This opinion, however, the Author offers only as the moft probable; and does not conceive it as being by any means a neceffary part of the fyftem of natural religion. He proceeds to demonftrate, in the fame manner, the cmnifcience, omnipotence, unchangeableness, and unity, of the Supreme Being.

[ocr errors]

It would lead us too far, were we to attempt to analyse the Author's arguments, and appofite illuftrations, produced to prove the general, and probably infinite, benevolence of the Deity; the great, and nearly infinite, preponderance of good, notwithstanding the neceffary existence of evil; the moral government of the world; and the evidence for a future ftate. We fhall confine ourselves to the giving an extract from his eighth letter, refpecting the laft of thefe fubjects; and in which he endeavours to convince even the Atheist, that, upon his own hypothefis, that there is no God, there yet may be a future ftate.

I think it of fome importance to obferve, that the degree of moral government under which we are (the conftitution of na

ture

« AnteriorContinuar »