Faith on Trial: Communities of Faith, the First Amendment, and the Theory of Deep DiversityLexington Books, 2002 - 223 páginas Guinn (International Human Rights Law Institute, DePaul U. College of Law) argues that current U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence and legal reasoning relating to concepts of religious freedom is both contradictory and discriminatory towards a number of groups, especially if they do not belong traditional forms of Protestant theology or liberal Judaism. He argues that this problem can only be adequately addressed from the standpoint of the theory of deep diversity. Deep diversity, like traditional liberalism, seeks to hold up the rights of the individual, but differs in its rejection of atomistic understandings of the individual in favor of a concept of a human identity that draws on communities of meaning. Guinn explores the implications that this theory would have on legal reasoning on a number of aspects of religious legal freedom. Annotation copyrighted by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR |
Contenido
Part II Religious Freedom and the Theory | 15 |
Religious Freedom in America | 25 |
The Nature of Religion and Its Implications for Supreme Court | 51 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 10 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Faith on Trial: Communities of Faith, the First Amendment, and the Theory of ... David E. Guinn Vista previa limitada - 2006 |
Términos y frases comunes
accepted accommodation according action activities adopted allow Amendment American applied approach argued arguments asserted attempt authority belief chapter Church citizens claim Clause concept concern considered Constitution culture decisions deep diversity demands determine develop difference discrimination dominant effort equality Establishment Clause example existing expressed fact faith favor female free exercise given grounds harm historical human idea identified identity important individual institution intent interest interpretation issue jurisprudence justified liberal limited means moral Moreover nature noted offered particular politics politics of difference position practice present principles problem protect Quebec question reasons recognized reflect regulation relation religion religious freedom represents requires respect result Second secular seeking simply social society standard status suggested Supreme Court Taylor theory of deep tion traditional treat treatment understanding United University values York
Referencias a este libro
Autonomy and Human Rights in Health Care: An International Perspective David N. Weisstub,Guillermo Díaz Pintos Vista previa limitada - 2007 |