Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

case, 1676-Provisions of the IIabeas Corpus Act, 1679-Its defects

-Remedied by Bill of Rights and Statute 56 Geo. III. c. 100-Acts

against Nonconformists-Corporation Act, 1661-Test Act, 1673-

Events which led to its being passed-Bill for relief of Dissenters-

Parliamentary Test Act, 1678-Act of Uniformity, 1662 Conventsele

Act, 1664-Five Mile Act, 1665-Persecution of Nonconformists—

Attempts at comprehension-Origin of the Whig and Tory parties-

and of their names-Differences in principle between the two parties

-The Exclusion Bill-Its failure, and prostration of the Whigs-Des-

potic power of Charles II. during the last years of his reign-JAMES

II. (1685-1688). His despotic designs-Circumstances favourable to

them-Illegal levy of the Customs-A Parliament summoned-Its
servile character-Its opposition to the King's design to overthrow the
Test Act punished by prorogation and ultimate dissolution-Increase
of the Standing Army-Growth of Standing Army-The dispensing
power-Hales's case-Deprivation of the Vice-Chancellor of Cam-
bridge-Expulsion of the Fellows of Magdalen College, Oxford-New
High Commission Court The King's Declaration for Liberty of
Conscience-Its motive-It is generally resisted by the Nonconformists
-Second Declaration of Indulgence-Ordered to be read in all churches
Imprisonment and prosecution of the Seven Bishops-Invitation to

William Prince of Orange -James endeavours o retrace his steps-

Efforts of Louis XIV, on his behalf-Landing of the Prince of Orange

-Flight of James-William is requested to assume the provisional

government-The Convention Parliament-Parties in the nation-

Resolutions of the Commons-Opposition in the Lords—William an-

nounces his intentions-The Lords give way, and vote that William and

Mary be proclaimed King and Queen-The Commons suggest condi-

tions-Postponement of reforms-Declaration of Right-Tender and

acceptance of the Crown-The Scottish Convention-Salutary Con-

sequences of the Revolution-Text of the BILL OF RIGHTS, with

-

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Legal prerogatives of the Crown untouched at the Revolution-but now

practically vested in its responsible ministers-Note on Convocation

Personal influence of the Sovereign-Causes which tended to induce

its decline-Reaches its lowest point under George I. and George II.

-Long struggle of George III. against the Ministerial system-

Character of the King-Disastrous effects of his policy-His wretched

education-His determination to govern-His secret counsellors—

Premiership of Lord Bute, 1762 -Ilis sudden fall-Continued secret

influence-Ultimate dismissal from Court - Arbitrary measures of the

King during the Bute and Grenville ministries-The Rockingham

ministry, 1765-Organized opposition in Parliament by the King's

friends to repeal of the Stamp Act-Ministry of Grafton and Pitt,

1766-Influence of the King attains its maximum during Lord North's

ministry, 1770-S2-The royal veto-Mr. Dunning's resolutions on the

influence of the Crown, 1780-Fall of Lord North's ministry, 1782-

Rockingham again Premier-Ministry of Lord Shelburne, 1782-The

Coalition Ministry, 1783-Opposition of the King's friends' to Fox's

India Bill, 1783-Declaration of the Commons against the use of the

King's name-Abrupt dismissal of the Coalition Ministry, 1783-

Critical relations of the King and Parliament-Mr. Pitt premier, 1783

-General election of 1754-Triumph of Pitt and the King-The

King's personal influence diminished-but still very powerful-Diminu-

tion of personal influence of the Sovereign since the reign of George III.

-Its occasional assertion-Sudden dismissal of Lord Melbourne's

ministry by William IV., 1834-Short premiership of Sir Robert Peel,

followed by recall of the Melbourne ministry, 1835-The 'Bedchamber

question,' 1839-Sir Robert Peel's resolution of want of confidence in

the ministry, 1841-He becomes Premier-The Queen's memorandum

on the relations of a Secretary of State to the Crown, 1850-Constitu

tional right of dismissing a minister-asserted in the removal of Lord

Palmerston from the foreign Secretaryship, 1851-Increased power of

the Executive-Revenues of the Crown-The Civil list-Crown lands

-Private property of the Sovereign .

Number of Peers-Rapid increase under the Stewart Kings-Addition of
16 representative peers of Scotland in 1706-Attempts to limit the
prerogative of creating peers-Profuse creations under George III.-
Pitt and the peerage-Addition of 28 representative peers of Ireland in
1801-The Peerage of Scotland and Ireland-Changes in Character
and Composition of House of Lords-Its political position-Its oppo-
sition to the Reform Bills of 1831-32-overcome by threatened crea-
tion of peers-Earl Grey's vindication of the proposed creation-An
extraordinary creation of peers equivalent to a dissolution of the House
of Commons-Political weight of the Upper House affected by small
attendance and indifference to public business of great body of its

[ocr errors]

Number of members-Defects of the representative system-Scottish repre-

sentation-Irish representation-Bribery of members-Parliamentary

Reform advocated by Lord Chatham in 1766-Wilkes' scheme of

reform 1776-Mr Pitt's advocacy of reform, 1782-85-The question

revived after the Peace of 1815 –Passing of the Reform Act of 1832 —

The principal provisions-The Scotch and Irish Reform Acts, 1832-

The Reform Act of 1867–Scotch and Irish Reform Acts 1868-

Electors of the United Kingdom Suppression of bribery and

intimidation at Elections The Ballot Act, 1872 Summons,

duration, and intermission of Parliament The Parliament of

1399

Convention Parliament of 1600 Convention Parliament

of 16SS -Triennial Act, 1941-Triennial Act, 1004 Septennial

Act, 1716—Attempts to repeal the Septennial Act-Abrogation of old

rule that Parliament was dissolved by death of the Sovereign-Privi-

lege of Parliament since the Revolution-sometimes wielded by the

Executive for oppression of popular liberty Expulsion of Sir R.

Steele, 1714-Proceedings against Wilkes, 1763—His expulsion from

the House-Declared incapable of re-election, 1768—The declaration

expunged from the Journal of the Commons, 1782 –Disqualification of

members-Cases of Smith O'Brien, 1849, O'Donovan Rossa, 1870,

John Mitchell, 1875-Abuse of privilege of Commitment-Case of the

printer Mist, 1721-Case of Mr. Alex. Murray, 1751-Case of Sir

Francis Burdett, 1810-Publication of Debates--Motives for secrecy

-The 'Diurnal Occurrences of Parliament': 1641-1660-Votes and

proceedings ordered to be printed, 1680-Debates published anony-

mously-Complaints of unfairness-Contest with the Printers, 1771—

and with the Lord Mayor and Aldermen of London-The Lord Mayor

(Brass Crosby) and Alderman Oliver committed to the Tower-Report-

ing still a breach of privilege-Exclusion of strangers-Resolution of

the House, 1875-Facilities afforded for reporting-Publication of

Division lists-and of Parliamentary Reports and papers-Political

results of reporting-Conflict between the Commons and Courts of

Law as to publication of papers affecting character-Stockdale v. Han-

sard-Right of Parliament to publish established by Act 3 & 4 Vict.

c. 9-Wason v. Walter, 1868.

[ocr errors]

The Censorship-The Press under James I. and Charles I.-The first
Newspaper, the Weekly Newes, in 1623-Continuance of the

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

FROM THE TEUTONIC CONQUEST OF BRITAIN TO THE
NORMAN CONQUEST OF ENGLAND.

THE first step in a history of the Institutions of the Origin of the
English people is to determine the elements of the English English.
nationality. It is not unusual to speak of the English
as a mixed race formed out of the fusion of the Britons,
the Anglo-Saxons, the Danes, and the Normans; but this
form of expression is apt to convey an erroneous idea of
the facts. No modern European nation is, indeed, of pure
unmingled race; yet in all some one element has maintained
a clear and decided predominance. In the English people
this predominant element is the German, or Teutonic.
The Teutonic conquest of Britain was something more Teutonic
than a mere conquest of the country: it was in all senses of Britain,
a national occupation, a sustained immigration of a new A.D. 450-
race, whose numbers, during a hundred and fifty years,
were continually being augmented by fresh arrivals from
the Fatherland.

Before the end of the 6th century, the Teutonic invaders had established a dominion in Britain, extending from the German Ocean to the Severn and from the English Channel to the Firth of Forth. The Britons were soon driven into the western parts of the island, where they maintained

B

conquest

600.

« AnteriorContinuar »