 | John Stuart Mill - 1865 - 572 páginas
...instantly become, not a larger amount of liquid, but a solid mass. § 2. This difference between the Cftse in which the joint effect of causes is the sum of their separate effects, and the * I omit, for simplicity, to take into account the effect, in this latter case, of the diminution... | |
 | Oswald Fred Boucke - 1922 - 328 páginas
...the principle of a Composition of Causes, not of chemical causation. A distinction was made "between the case in which the joint effect of causes is the sum of their separate effects, and the case in which it is heterogeneous to them; between laws which work together without alteration,... | |
 | Oswald Fred Boucke - 1922 - 332 páginas
...the principle of a Composition of Causes, not of chemical causation. A distinction was made "between the case in which the joint effect of causes is the sum of their separate effects, and the case in which it is heterogeneous to them; between laws which work together without alteration,... | |
 | Ansgar Beckermann, Hans Flohr, Jaegwon Kim - 1992 - 332 páginas
...Mill who marked his distinction by the words "homopathic" and "heteropathic": [The] difference between the case in which the joint effect of causes is the sum of their separate effects, and the case in which it is heterogeneous to them; between laws which work together without alteration,... | |
 | John Skorupski - 1998 - 612 páginas
...opposed to those such as chemistry and psychology where the effect is "heterogeneous" with its causes, "the joint effect of causes is the sum of their separate effects" (CW VII:373, italics added), and, while we know the law of the separate causes by induction, the inference... | |
| |
This difference between the case in which the joint effect of causes is the sum of their separate effects and the case in which it is heterogeneous to them — between laws which work together without alteration, and laws which, when called upon to work... 