 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1956 - 164 páginas
...and among other courts about three of our recent holdings, Seas Shipping Co. v. Sicracki, 328 US 85; Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282; and Pope £ Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn, 346 US 406. In each of these cases a worker in the same position... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Education and Labor - 1956 - 156 páginas
...hearing] of the annexed case. They are the cases of Seas Skipping Company v. Sieracki (328 US 85), Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling <& Refitting Corp. (342 US 282), and Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. tf awn (346 US 406). In each instance, the Supreme Court resisted all attempts... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1964 - 954 páginas
...Co. v. Pan- Atlantic SS Corp., 350 US 124, and its progeny, nor by the general law of warranty. In Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282, and Pope & Talbot, Inc., \. Hawn, 346 US 406, we held that the system of compensation which Congress... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1969 - 1102 páginas
...occasioned by the latter's negligence. This holding is in no wise a departure from our decision in Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282, 285, that we would not "fashion care under the circumstances to load or discharge the cargo, as the... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1975 - 666 páginas
...damages rule in at least two recent cases. See Weyerhaeuser SS Co. v. United States, 372 US 597, 603; Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282, 284. But in neither case did the Court have occasion to re-examine the rule or to appraise the validity... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1975 - 668 páginas
...damages rule in at least two recent cases. See Weyerhaeuser SS Co. v. United States, 372 US 597, 603; Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282, 284. But in neither case did the Court have occasion to re-examine the rule or to appraise the validity... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor - 1976 - 1488 páginas
...'• Federal Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co., 394 US '04 (1969). See note 4 supra. « Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282 (1952). The statutory language directly relevant in most of these cases is a familiar passage similar... | |
 | Robert Force, Athanassios N. Yiannopoulos, Martin Davies - 2005 - 524 páginas
...circumvent the exclusive-remedy provision by obtaining contribution from the concurrent tortfeasor employer. Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282 (1952); Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn, supra', see Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Fritz Kopke, Inc., 417 US... | |
| |
Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp., 342 US 282, 72 S.Ct. 277, 96 L.Ed. 318... 