Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
actuarial additional adequate administration adopted agency amended American amount apply assets believe benefits bill Committee compensation concern Congress consideration continue contributions corporate cost covered deduction Department determine disclosure earned effective employees enforcement established example existing experience fact Federal fiduciary Finance funding going hearings included income increase individual industry interest Internal Revenue Code Internal Revenue Service investment Labor legislation less liability limits loss matter means ment million operation paid participants pension benefits percent period permit persons plan termination portability present private pension plans problem profit sharing proposed protection qualified question reason receive reform regulation requirements respect responsibility result retirement rules savings Senator NELSON Social Security standards statement Subcommittee suggest termination insurance tion treatment trust union United vesting Welfare workers
Página 1190 - ... solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries and (A) for the exclusive purpose of: (i) providing benefits to participants and their beneficiaries. . . . (B) with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims...
Página 731 - Upon principle, every statute which takes away or impairs vested rights acquired under existing laws, or creates a new obligation, imposes a new duty, or attaches a new disability, in respect to transactions or considerations already past, must be deemed retrospective.
Página 733 - Contracts, however express, cannot fetter the constitutional authority of the Congress. Contracts may create rights of property, but when contracts deal with a subject matter which lies within the control of the Congress, they have a congenital infirmity. Parties cannot remove their transactions from the reach of dominant constitutional power by making contracts about them.
Página 1251 - ... a person (including the employer) other than a bank may be granted, under the trust instrument, the power to control the investment of the trust funds either by directing investments (including reinvestments, disposals, and exchanges) or by disapproving proposed investments (including reinvestments, disposals, and exchanges).
Página 1200 - ... furnishing of goods, services, or facilities by a private foundation to a disqualified person shall not be an act of selfdealing if such furnishing is made on a basis no more favorable than that on which such goods, services, or facilities are made available to the general public...
Página 1182 - Corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals...
Página 736 - to safeguard the vital interests of its people" ... is not to be gainsaid by abstracting one such arrangement from its public context and treating it as though it were an isolated private contract constitutionally immune from impairment.
Página 737 - And the guaranty of due process, as has often been held, demands only that the law shall not be unreasonable, arbitrary, or capricious, and that the means selected shall have a real and substantial relation to the object sought to be attained.
Página 735 - That provision has always been understood as referring only to a direct appropriation, and not to consequential injuries resulting from the exercise of lawful power. It has never been supposed to have any bearing upon, or to inhibit laws that indirectly work harm and loss to individuals.