...difficulties; the reader would not profit by it. What does Mr Mill mean by saying the stumblingblock is not in any theory of the fact, but in the fact itself ? What is fatal to any theory but some fact that cannot be made to harmonise with the theory ? which,...

...not complete without the rider that "the series of feelings can be aware of itself as a series," or that '' something which has ceased, or is not yet in existence, can still, in a manner, be present," then the word " substance," with all its faults, seems a very exact etymological...

...other that it eannot be expressed in any terms which do not deny its truth. The real gtumblinghlock is, perhaps, not in any theory of the fact, but in...incomprehensibility perhaps is, that something which has censed, or is not yet in existence, can still be in a manner present; that a series of feelings, the...

...not complete without the rider that " the series of feelings can be aware of itself as a series," or that " something which has ceased, or is not yet in existence, can still, in a manner, be present," then the word " substance," with all its faults, seems a very exact etymological...

...difficulties ; the reader would not profit by it. What does Mr. Mill mean by saying the stumblingblock is not in any theory of the fact, but in the fact itself? What is fatal to any theory but some fact that cannot be made to harmonise with the theory? which,...

...not complete without the rider that " the series of feelings can be aware of itself as a series," or that "something which has ceased, or is not yet in existence, can still, in a manner, be present," then the word " substance," with all its faults, seems a very exact etymological...

...not complete without the rider that " the series of feelings can be aware of itself as a series," or that " something which has ceased, or is not yet in existence, can still, in a manner, be present," then the word "substance," with all its faults, seems a very exact etymological...

...appears more incomprehensible than another, ' because the whole of human language is accom' modated to the one, and is so incongruous with the ' other,...' in the fact itself. The true incomprehensibility per' haps is, that something which has ceased or is not ' yet in existence, can still be in a manner...

...in the fact itself.' The true incomprehensibility, he again says, is ' perhaps,' that ' some' thing which has ceased, or is not yet in existence, can still be ' in a manner present,' thut ' a series cf feelings, the infinitely ' greater part of which is past or future ' can be ' gathered...

...Relativity of human knowledge, the fact as it stands, that there is something in Mind which can gather up " a series of feelings, the infinitely greater part of which is past or future, into a single present conception, accompanied by a belief of reality."§ But this in no way affects...