...the entire record, should be approved. In considering the record it shall have authority to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact, recognizing that the trial court saw and heard the witnesses. (d) If the board of review sets aside...

...articles the Judge Advocate General and all appellate agencies in his office shall have authority to weigh evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact. [(W Finality of court-martial judgments. — The appellate review of records of trial provided by this...

...articles the Judge Advocate General and all appellate agencies in his office shall have authority to weigh evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact. [(h) Finality of court-martial judgments. — The appellate review of records of al provided by this...

...— In the course of taking action upon a record of trial, the convening authority is empowered to weigh evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact, recognizing that the trial court saw and heard the witnesses. In considering the evidence, he will...

...3000) BOEDEKER 703 50 (g), requiring appellate agencies in the Office of The Judge Advocate General to weigh evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact (Appx 1, p 290, MCM, 1949), we find the phrase "substantial competent evidence" possibly misleading,...

...the guilty soldier. The power of appellate agencies in the office of The Judge Advocate General to weigh evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact should be exercised with a view to substantial justice. The infirmities in the prosecution's case are...

...was accomplished with the consent and cooperation of the woman. The Board is authorized to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact (A W 50g; MCM, 1949, par 98), and therefore must decide whether the Court erred in believing the woman...

...against the accused. While the Board of Review has the authority, power and duty "... to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact", nothing appears in the record which indicates that the ruling of the law member admitting accused's...

...1951, subpar 86b(1)(c), p 142). In the course of such action, the convening authority is empowered to weigh evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact (ibid, subpar 87a(3), p 145). When the evidence, although legally insufficient to establish the guilt...

...the entire record, should be approved. In considering the record it shall have authority to weigh the evidence, judge the credibility of witnesses, and determine controverted questions of fact, recognizing that the trial court saw and heard the witnesses." Here the board relied on its power to...