Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

the language of your own ancient acts of parlia- | the noble lord in the blue riband, now standing

ment.

Non meus hic sermo, sed quæ præcepit Ofellus,
Rusticus, abnormis sapiens.

It is the genuine produce of the ancient, rustick,
manly, home-bred sense of this country. I did not
dare to rub off a particle of the venerable rust that
rather adorns and preserves, than destroys, the
metal. It would be a profanation to touch with a
tool the stones which construct the sacred altar of
peace. I would not violate with modern polish the
ingenuous and noble roughness of these truly con-
stitutional materials. Above all things, I was re-
solved not to be guilty of tampering: the odious
vice of restless and unstable minds. I put my foot
in the tracks of our forefathers; where I can neither
wander nor stumble. Determining to fix articles of
peace, I was resolved not to be wise beyond what
was written; I was resolved to use nothing else than
the form of sound words; to let others abound in
their own sense; and carefully to abstain from all
expressions of my own. What the law has said,
I say. In all things else I am silent. I have no
organ but for her words. This, if it be not in-
genious, I am sure is safe.

on your journals, the strongest of all proofs that parliamentary subsidies really touched and grieved them? Else why all these changes, modifications, repeals, assurances, and resolutions?

The next proposition is-" That, from the "distance of the said colonies, and from other "circumstances, no method hath hitherto been "devised for procuring a representation in parlia"ment for the said colonies." This is an assertion

of a fact. I go no further on the paper; though, in my private judgment, an useful representation is impossible; I am sure it is not desired by them; nor ought it perhaps by us; but I abstain from opinions.

[ocr errors]

The fourth resolution is-" That each of the "said colonies hath within itself a body, chosen in " part, or in the whole, by the freemen, freeholders, or other free inhabitants thereof, commonly "called the General Assembly or General Court; "with powers legally to raise, levy, and assess, according to the several usage of such colonies, "duties and taxes towards defraying all sorts of publick services."

66

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

This competence in the colony assemblies is certain. It is proved by the whole tenour of their There are indeed words expressive of grievance acts of supply in all the assemblies, in which the in this second resolution, which those who are constant style of granting is, an aid to his resolved always to be in the right will deny to" majesty ;" and acts granting to the crown have contain matter of fact, as applied to the present regularly for near a century passed the publick case; although parliament thought them true, with offices without dispute. Those who have been regard to the counties of Chester and Durham. pleased paradoxically to deny this right, holding They will deny that the Americans were ever that none but the British parliament can grant to "touched and grieved" with the taxes. If they the crown, are wished to look to what is done, not consider nothing in taxes but their weight as pe- only in the colonies, but in Ireland, in one uniform cuniary impositions, there might be some pretence unbroken tenour every session. Sir, I am surprised for this denial. But men may be sorely touched that this doctrine should come from some of the and deeply grieved in their privileges, as well as law servants of the crown. I say, that if the crown in their purses.. Men may lose little in property could be responsible, his majesty-but certainly the by the act which takes away all their freedom. ministers, and even these law officers themselves, When a man is robbed of a trifle on the highway, through whose hands the acts pass biennially in it is not the two-pence lost that constitutes the Ireland, or annually in the colonies, are in an Capital outrage. This is not confined to privileges. habitual course of committing impeachable ofEven ancient indulgences withdrawn, without of- fences. What habitual offenders have been all face on the part of those who enjoyed such fa- presidents of the council, all secretaries of state, all Tours, operate as grievances. But were the Ame- first lords of trade, all attornies and all solicitors ricans then not touched and grieved by the taxes, general! However, they are safe; as no one imin some measure, merely as taxes? If so, why peaches them; and there is no ground of charge were they almost all either wholly repealed or ex- against them, except in their own unfounded eedingly reduced? Were they not touched and theories. eved even by the regulating duties of the sixth of George II.? Else why were the duties first educed to one third in 1764, and afterwards to a hurd of that third in the year 1766? Were they mot touched and grieved by the stamp act? I shall they were, until that tax is revived. Were they not touched and grieved by the duties of 1767, which were likewise repealed, and which Lord Hillsborough tells you (for the ministry) were laid contrary to the true principle of commerce? Is not the assurance given by that noble person to the colonies of a resolution to lay no more taxes on them, an admission that taxes would touch and grieve them? Is not the resolution of

The fifth resolution is also a resolution of fact"That the said general assemblies, general courts, "or other bodies legally qualified as aforesaid, have "at sundry times freely granted several large sub"sidies and publick aids for his majesty's service, "according to their abilities, when required there"to by letter from one of his majesty's principal "secretaries of state; and that their right to grant "the same, and their cheerfulness and sufficiency "in the said grants, have been at sundry times "acknowledged by parliament." To say nothing of their great expences in the Indian wars; and not to take their exertion in foreign ones, so high as the supplies in the year 1695; not to go back

[blocks in formation]

"That it is the opinion of this committee, That "it is just and reasonable that the several pro"vinces and colonies of Massachuset's Bay, New "Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island, be "reimbursed the expences they have been at in "taking and securing to the crown of Great Britain "the island of Cape Breton and its dependencies."

These expences were immense for such colonies. They were above 200,0007. sterling; money first raised and advanced on their publick credit.

On the 28th of January, 1756,† a message from the king came to us, to this effect-"His majesty, "being sensible of the zeal and vigour with which "his faithful subjects of certain colonies in North "America have exerted themselves in defence of "his majesty's just rights and possessions, recom"mends it to this house to take the same into "their consideration, and to enable his majesty to give them such assistance as may be a proper "reward and encouragement."

[ocr errors]

On the 3d of February, 1756, the house came to a suitable resolution, expressed in words nearly the same as those of the message: but with the further addition, that the money then voted was as an encouragement to the colonies to exert themselves with vigour. It will not be necessary to go through all the testimonies which your own records have given to the truth of my resolutions, I will only refer you to the places in the journals:

Vol. xxvii.-16th and 19th May, 1757. Vol. xxviii.-June 1st, 1758-April 26th and 30th, 1759-March 26th and 31st, and April 28th, 1760-Jan. 9th and 20th, 1761.

Vol. xxix.-Jan. 22d and 26th, 1762-March 14th and 17th, 1763.

Sir, here is the repeated acknowledgment of parliament, that the colonies not only gave, but gave to satiety. This nation has formally acknowledged two things; first, that the colonies had gone beyond their abilities, parliament having thought it necessary to reimburse them; secondly, that they had acted legally and laudably in their grants of money, and their maintenance of troops, since the compensation is expressly given as reward and encouragement. Reward is not bestowed for acts that are unlawful; and encouragement is not held out to things that deserve reprehension. My resolution therefore does nothing more than collect into one proposition, what is scattered through your journals. I give you

Journals of the House, Vol. xxv.

|

nothing but your own; and you cannot refuse in the gross, what you have so often acknowledged in detail. The admission of this, which will be so honourable to them and to you, will, indeed, be mortal to all the miserable stories, by which the passions of the misguided people have been engaged in an unhappy system. The people heard, indeed, from the beginning of these disputes, one thing continually dinned in their ears, that reason and justice demanded, that the Americans, who paid no taxes, should be compelled to contribute. How did that fact, of their paying nothing, stand, when the taxing system began? When Mr. Grenville began to form his system of American revenue, he stated in this house, that the colonies were then in debt two million six hundred thou sand pounds sterling money; and was of opinion they would discharge that debt in four years. On this state, those untaxed people were actually subject to the payment of taxes to the amount of six hundred and fifty thousand a year. In fact, however, Mr. Grenville was mistaken. The funds given for sinking the debt did not prove quite so ample as both the colonies and he expected The calculation was too sanguine; the reduction was not completed till some years after, and 2: different times in different colonies. However, the taxes after the war continued too great to beat any addition, with prudence or propriety; and when the burthens imposed in consequence of former requisitions were discharged, our tone be came too high to resort again to requisition. N colony, since that time, ever has had any requisi tion whatsoever made to it.

We see the sense of the crown, and the sensed parliament, on the productive nature of a recen by grant. Now search the same journals for th produce of the revenue by imposition-Where > it ?-let us know the volume and the page-w is the gross, what is the net produce?-to whe service is it applied ?-how have you appropriate its surplus ?-What, can none of the many ski index-makers, that we are now employing, fir any trace of it?-Well, let them and that res together. But are the journals, which say nothing of the revenue, as silent on the discontent?-0 no! a child may find it. It is the melancholy burthen and blot of every page.

I think then I am, from those journals, justifi in the sixth and last resolution, which is "Th "it hath been found by experience, that the "manner of granting the said supplies and aids,

the said general assemblies, hath been more agre "able to the said colonies, and more beneficial. "and conducive to the publick service, than ti "mode of giving and granting aids in parliament. "to be raised and paid in the said colonies." T makes the whole of the fundamental part of the plan. The conclusion is irresistible. You can say, that you were driven by any necessity to a exercise of the utmost rights of legislature. Y cannot assert, that you took on yourselves the tas of imposing colony taxes, from the want of anota

↑ Ibid. Vol. xxvii. ! Ibid.

legal body, that is competent to the purpose of supplying the exigencies of the state without wounding the prejudices of the people. Neither is it true that the body so qualified, and having that competence, had neglected the duty.

The question now, on all this accumulated matter, is;-whether you will choose to abide by a profitable experience, or a mischievous theory; whether you choose to build on imagination, or fact; whether you prefer enjoyment, or hope; satisfaction in your subjects, or discontent?

64

66

[ocr errors]

44

66

[ocr errors]

does not go to the length of the Boston Port Act. The same ideas of prudence, which induced you not to extend equal punishment to equal guilt, even when you were punishing, induce me, who mean not to chastise, but to reconcile, to be satisfied with the punishment already partially inflicted.

Ideas of prudence and accommodation to circumstances, prevent you from taking away the charters of Connecticut and Rhode Island, as you have taken away that of Massachuset's colony, though the crown has far less power in the two former provinces than it enjoyed in the latter; and though the abuses have been full as great, and as flagrant, in the exempted as in the punished. The same reasons of prudence and accommodation have weight with me in restoring the charter of Massachuset's Bay. Besides, Sir, the act which changes the charter of Massachuset's is in many particulars so exceptionable, that if I did not wish absolutely to repeal, I would by all means desire to alter it; as several of its provisions tend to the subversion of all publick and private justice. Such, among others, is the power in the governour to change the sheriff at his pleasure; and to make a new returning officer for every special cause. It is shameful to behold such a regulation standing among English laws.

The act for bringing persons accused of committing murder under the orders of government to England for trial is but temporary. That act has calculated the probable duration of our quarrel with the colonies; and is accommodated to that supposed duration. I would hasten the happy moment of reconciliation; and therefore must, on my principle, get rid of that most justly obnoxi

If these propositions are accepted, every thing which has been made to enforce a contrary system, must, I take it for granted, fall along with it. On that ground, I have drawn the following resolution, which, when it comes to be moved, will naturally be divided in a proper manner: "That "it may be proper to repeal an act, made in the "seventh year of the reign of his present majesty, intituled, An act for granting certain duties in "the British colonies and plantations in America; for allowing a drawback of the duties of customs upon the exportation from this kingdom, of "coffee and cocoa-nuts of the produce of the said "colonies or plantations; for discontinuing the "drawbacks payable on China earthenware exported to America; and for more effectually "preventing the clandestine running of goods. "in the said colonies and plantations.-And that it may be proper to repeal an act, made in the "fourteenth year of the reign of his present "majesty, intituled, An act to discontinue, in such manner, and for such time, as are therein men"tioned, the landing and discharging, lading or "shipping, of goods, wares, and merchandise, at "the town and within the harbour of Boston, in "the province of Massachuset's Bay, in North "America.And that it may be proper to repeal “an act, made in the fourteenth year of the reign "of his present majesty, intituled, An act for the "impartial administration of justice, in the cases of persons questioned for any acts done by them, "in the execution of the law, or for the suppres"sion of riots and tumults, in the province of "Massachuset's Bay, in New England. And that "it may be proper to repeal an act, made in the fourteenth year of the reign of his present majesty, intituled, An act for the better regulating the government of the province of Massachuset's Bay, in New England. And, also, that it may be proper to explain and amend an act, made in the thirty-fifth year of the reign of King Henry the Eighth, intituled, An act for the "trial of treasons committed out of the king's" chief justice and other judges of the superiour dominions."

[ocr errors]

I wish, Sir, to repeal the Boston Port Bill, because (independently of the dangerous precedent of suspending the rights of the subject during the king's pleasure) it was passed, as I apprehend, with less regularity, and on more partial principles, than it ought. The corporation of Boston was not heard before it was condemned. Other towns, full as guilty as she was, have not had their ports blocked up. Even the restraining bill of the present session

ous act.

The act of Henry the Eighth, for the trial of treasons, I do not mean to take away, but to confine it to its proper bounds and original intention; to make it expressly for trial of treasons (and the greatest treasons may be committed) in places where the jurisdiction of the crown does not extend.

Having guarded the privileges of local legislature, I would next secure to the colonies a fair and unbiassed judicature; for which purpose, Sir, I propose the following resolution: "That, from "the time when the general assembly or general "court of any colony or plantation in North Ame"rica, shall have appointed by act of assembly, "duly confirmed, a settled salary to the offices "of the chief justice and other judges of the su"periour court, it may be proper that the said

"courts of such colony, shall hold his and their "office and offices during their good behaviour; "and shall not be removed therefrom, but when "the said removal shall be adjudged by his ma"jesty in council, upon hearing on complaint "from the general assembly, or on a complaint "from the governour, or council, or the house of "representatives severally, of the colony in which "the said chief justice and other judges have ex"ercised the said offices."

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]

These courts I do not wish to take away; they are in themselves proper establishments. This court is one of the capital securities of the act of navigation. The extent of its jurisdiction, indeed, has been increased; but this is altogether as proper, and is, indeed, on many accounts, more eligible, where new powers were wanted, than a court absolutely new. But courts incommodiously situated, in effect, deny justice; and a court, partaking in the fruits of its own condemnation, is a robber. The congress complain, and complain justly, of this grievance.*

These are the three consequential propositions. I have thought of two or three more; but they came rather too near detail, and to the province of executive government; which I wish parliament always to superintend, never to assume. If the first six are granted, congruity will carry the latter three. If not, the things that remain unrepealed, will be, I hope, rather unseemly incumbrances on the building, than very materially detrimental to its strength and stability.

Here, Sir, I should close; but that I plainly perceive some objections remain, which I ought, if possible, to remove. The first will be, that, in resorting to the doctrine of our ancestors, as contained in the preamble to the Chester act, I prove too much; that the grievance from a want of representation stated in that preamble goes to the whole of legislation as well as to taxation. And that the colonies, grounding themselves upon that doctrine, will apply it to all parts of legislative authority.

To this objection, with all possible deference and humility, and wishing as little as any man living to impair the smallest particle of our supreme authority, I answer, that the words are the words of parliament, and not mine; and, that all false and inconclusive inferences, drawn from them, are not mine; for I heartily disclaim any such inference. I have chosen the words of an act of parliament, which Mr. Grenville, surely a tolerably zealous and very judicious advocate for the sovereignty of parliament, formerly moved to have read at your table in confirmation of his tenets. It is true, that Lord Chatham considered these preambles as declaring strongly in favour of his opinions. He was a no less powerful advocate for the privileges of the Americans. Ought I not from hence to presume, that these preambles are as favourable as possible to both, when properly understood; favourable both to the rights of par

The Solicitor General informed Mr. B. when the resolutions were separately moved, that the grievance of the judges partak

[ocr errors]

liament, and to the privilege of the dependencies of this crown? But, Sir, the object of grievance in my resolution I have not taken from the Chester, but from the Durham act, which confines the hardship of want of representation to the case of subsidies; and which therefore falls in exactly with the case of the colonies. But whether the unrepresented counties were de jure, or de facto, bound, the preambles do not accurately distinguish; nor indeed was it necessary; for, whether de jure, or de facto, the legislature thought the exercise of the power of taxing, as of right, or as of fact without right, equally a grievance, and equally oppressive. I do not know, that the colonies have, in any general way, or in any cool hour, gone much be yond the demand of immunity in relation to taxes. It is not fair to judge of the temper or dispositions of any man, or any set of men, when they are composed and at rest, from their conduct, or their expressions, in a state of disturbance and irritation. It is besides a very great mistake to imagine, that mankind follow up practically any speculative principle, either of government or of freedom, as far as it will go in argument and logical illation. We Englishmen stop very short of the principles upon which we support any given part of our constitution; or even the whole of it together. I could easily, if I had not already tired you, give you very striking and convincing instances of it. This is nothing but what is natural and proper. All government, indeed every human benefit and enjoyment, every virtue, and every prudent act, is founded on compromise and barter. We balance inconveniences; we give and take; we remit some rights, that we may enjoy others; and, we choose rather to be happy citizens, than subtle disputants. As we must give away some natural liberty, to enjoy civil advantages; so we must sacrifice some civil liberties, for the advantages to be derived from the communion and fellowship of a great empire. But, in all fair dealings, the thing bought must bear some proportion to the purchase paid. None will barter away the immediate jewel of his soul. Though a great house is apt to make slaves haughty, yet it is purchasing a part of the artificial importance of a great empire too dear, to pay for it all essential rights. and all the intrinsick dignity of human nature. None of us who would not risk his life rather than fall under a government purely arbitrary. But although there are some amongst us who think our constitution wants many improvements, to mak it a complete system of liberty; perhaps none who are of that opinion would think it right to am at such improvement, by disturbing his country. and risking every thing that is dear to him. In every arduous enterprise, we consider what we are to lose, as well as what we are to gain; and the more and better stake of liberty every people possess, the less they will hazard in a vain attempt to make it more. These are the cords of man Man acts from adequate motives relative to his ining of the profits of the seizure had been redressed by office, accordingly the resolution was amended.

terest; and not on metaphysical speculations. Aristotle, the great master of reasoning, cautions us, and with great weight and propriety, against this species of delusive geometrical accuracy in moral arguments, as the most fallacious of all sophistry.

The Americans will have no interest contrary to the grandeur and glory of England, when they are not oppressed by the weight of it; and they will rather be inclined to respect the acts of a superintending legislature, when they see them the acts of that power, which is itself the security, not the rival, of their secondary importance. In this assurance, my mind most perfectly acquiesces and I confess, I feel not the least alarm from the discontents which are to arise from putting people at their ease; nor do I apprehend the destruction of this empire, from giving, by an act of free grace and indulgence, to two millions of my fellow citizens some share of those rights, upon which I have always been taught to value myself.

of

It is said, indeed, that this power of granting, vested in American assemblies, would dissolve the unity of the empire; which was preserved entire, although Wales, and Chester, and Durham, were added to it. Truly, Mr. Speaker, I do not know what this unity means; nor has it ever been heard of, that I know, in the constitutional policy of this country. The very idea of subordination parts, excludes this notion of simple and undivided unity. England is the head; but she is not the head and the members too. Ireland has ever had from the beginning a separate, but not an independent, legislature; which, far from distracting, promoted the union of the whole. Every thing was sweetly and harmoniously disposed through both islands for the conservation of Engish dominion, and the communication of English liberties. I do not see that the same principles might not be carried into twenty islands, and with the same good effect. This is my model with regard to America, as far as the internal circumstances of the two countries are the same. I know no other unity of this empire, than I can draw trom its example during these periods, when it emed to my poor understanding more united than it is now, or than it is likely to be by the present methods.

But since I speak of these methods, I recollect, Mr. Speaker, almost too late, that I promised, +fore I finished, to say something of the proposition of the noble lord on the floor, which has been so lately received, and stands on your jourals. I must be deeply concerned, whenever it is my misfortune to continue a difference with the majority of this house. But as the reasons for that difference are my apology for thus troubling ou, suffer me to state them in a very few words. I shall compress them into as small a body as I ssibly can, having already debated that matter at large, when the question was before the com

Littee.

• Lord North.

First, then, I cannot admit that proposition of a ransom by auction ;- because it is a mere project. It is a thing new; unheard of; supported by no experience; justified by no analogy; without example of our ancestors, or root in the constitution.

It is neither regular parliamentary taxation, nor colony grant. Experimentum in corpore vili, is a good rule, which will ever make me adverse to any trial of experiments on what is certainly the most valuable of all subjects; the peace of this empire.

Secondly, it is an experiment which must be fatal in the end to our constitution. For what is it but a scheme for taxing the colonies in the antechamber of the noble lord and his successors? To settle the quotas and proportions in this house, is clearly impossible. You, Sir, may flatter yourself, you shall sit a state auctioneer, with your hammer in your hand, and knock down to each colony as it bids. But to settle (on the plan laid down by the noble lord) the true proportional payment for four or five and twenty governments, according to the absolute and the relative wealth of each, and according to the British proportion of wealth and burthen, is a wild and chimerical notion. This new taxation must therefore come in by the back-door of the constitution. Each quota must be brought to this house ready formed; you can neither add nor alter. You must register it. You can do nothing further. For on what grounds can you deliberate either before or after the propositions? You cannot hear the counsel for all these provinces, quarrelling each on its own quantity of payment, and its proportion to others. If you should attempt it, the committee of provincial ways and means, or by whatever other name it will delight to be called, must swallow up all the time of parliament.

Thirdly, it does not give satisfaction to the complaint of the colonies. They complain, that they are taxed without their consent; you answer, that you shall fix the sum at which they shall be taxed. That is, you give them the very grievance for the remedy. You tell them indeed, that you will leave the mode to themselves. I really beg pardon : it gives me pain to mention it; but you must be sensible that you will not perform this part of the compact. For, suppose the colonies were to lay the duties, which furnished their contingent, upon the importation of your manufactures; you know you would never suffer such a tax to be laid. You know too, that you would not suffer many other modes of taxation. So that, when you come to explain yourself, it will be found, that you will neither leave to themselves the quantum nor the mode; nor indeed any thing. The whole is delusion from one end to the other.

Fourthly, this method of ransom by auction, unless it be universally accepted, will plunge you into great and inextricable difficulties. In what year of our Lord are the proportions of payments to be settled? To say nothing of the impossibility

« AnteriorContinuar »