Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[blocks in formation]

66

[ocr errors]

New Hampshire is reputed to be good State to emigrate from." At all events there are now, and have been for nearly a century past, natives of New Hampshire occupying pre-eminent positions among the distinguished citizens of other States in all sections of the Union, embracing governors, congressmen, senators, judges of the supreme court, cabinet ministers, eminent jurists, divines and journalists, as well as many of the leading minds in the various departments of active business. But while we at home are proud of the names and the achievements of those in other States who have gone out from our midst, as well as those who have won distinction and honor at home, we should not entirely forget the fact that New Hampshire, while contributing so largely to other States, has received something in return-that while numbers of her sons have performed honorable service in various fields of action abroad, not a few from other States have made their home with us, winning honorable position and contributing to the material prosperity and general welfare of the State. Many of the prominent representative men of the State, known to the present generation, in public life at the bar and on the bench, including such names as Burke, Bingham, Hibbard, Foster, Benton, Ray, and others, were born in our sister State of Vermont, while many others, not less eminent and

successful, came from Massachusetts and other States.

Among the representative men of the State, in active business life at the present time, not only upon the ground of business success, but from his connection with public and political affairs, ALVAH W. SULLOWAY of Franklin may properly be regarded as worthy of mention.

Mr. Sulloway is a native of Framingham, Mass., born Dec. 25, 1838. His father, I. W. Sulloway, who is still living, and now resides at Waltham, Mass., was an overseer in the Saxonville Woolen Mills. He had a family of four children, one son and three daughters Alvah W., the son, being the eldest. Of the daughters, two are living, one still unmarried, and the other the wife of Herbert Bailey, a hosiery manufacturer now in business in the town of Claremont. When Alvah was ten years of age his father removed to the town of Enfield in this State, where he engaged in the manufacture of yarn and hosiery, remaining some sixteen years, when he sold out to his son-in-law and retired from business. When not attending school, in his youth Mr. Sulloway was engaged in his father's mill, and thus became thoroughly familiarized with the details and general operation of the manufacturing business in which he has subsequently been so actively and success

[graphic][merged small]

ademical education, attending school at Canaan, and at the academies in Barre and Woodstock, Vt. When twenty-one years of age Mr. Sulloway went to Franklin and went into business in the manufacture of hosiery, in partnership with Walter Aiken. He continued in business with Mr. Aiken about four years, when the partnership was dissolved, and, in company with Frank H. Daniell, he put in operation another hosiery mill, running in company with Mr. Daniell until 1869, when he became sole proprietor, and has since carried on the business alone. Possessed of good judgment, business tact and energy, and devoting his personal attention, in a large degree, to the superintendence of the work, with the details of which he is familiar from early experience, he has been highly favored in point of business prosperity, and is apparently well on the way to competence and wealth, while at the same time benifitting the public by furnishing employment to numbers of people.

Mr. Sulloway's mill is situated on the lower power of the Winnipiseogee River, a short distance above its junction with the Pemigewassett, by which it is operated in common with the lower mills of the Winnipiseogee Paper Company, well known as one of the largest paper manufacturing corporations in New England, of which Hon. Warren F. Daniell, a brother-in-law of Mr. Sulloway, is agent and manager. The mill is of brick, three stories and basement, running four sets of woolen machinery and fifty knitting machines, and giving employment to about seventy-five hands, beside the large numbers of women throughout the surrounding country engaged in finishing the work which the machines leave incomplete. The goods manufactured are known as men's Shaker socks, or halfhose, and the amount annually produced averages one hundred and fifty thousand dollars in value, while the monthly payroll at the mill is about two thousand, exclusive of the large amount paid for outside work.

He

From his youth Mr. Sulloway has taken much interest in political affairs. Strongly attached to the principles of the Democratic party, ardent, enthusiastic and persistent in his efforts for its success, he has become one of its recognized leaders in his section of the State. was elected a representative from Franklin to the legislature in 1871, although there was at the time a decided party majority against him in the town. He was re-elected the following year and again in 1874 and 1875. In the legislature he was a working rather than a talking member, serving in 1871 upon the committee on elections; in 1872 upon the railroad committee; in 1874 as chairman of the committee on manufactures, for which position he was eminently well qualified,and in 1875 again upon the elections committee. In 1871 Mr. Sulloway was the Democratic candidate for Railroad Commissioner upon the ticket with Gov. Weston, and, there being no choice by the people, was elected to that office by the legislature, and ably discharged his duties for the full term of three years.

Mr. Sulloway was one of the delegates to the National Democratic Convention at St. Louis, in June, 1876, which nominated Samuel J. Tilden for the Presidency, and was selected by the delegation as the New Hampshire member of the Democratic National Executive Committee, which position he now holds. Last winter he was nominated as the Democratic candidate for Congress in the Second District, against Hon. James F. Briggs of Manchester, the Republican nominee, and, although his party was in a hopeless minority in the District, he made a vigorous canvass and ran several hundred votes ahead of his ticket. He has been for several years an active member of the Democratic State Committee, and for the last two years one of the advisory committe of three

having charge of the active work of the canvass.

Mr. Sulloway married, in 1866, Miss Susan K. Daniell, a daughter of the late J. T. Daniell of the old and well-known paper manufacturing firm of Peabody & Daniell, and sister of Hon. Warren F. Daniell and Frank H. Daniell, his former partner, before mentioned. They have two children, a daughter six, and a son about two years of age. Last season Mr. Sulloway completed an elegant new residence, which is delightfully located in a bend of the Winnipiseogee River, a short distance from his mill. The house is of modern design, convenient in all its appointments, thoroughly finished and richly furnished throughout, and all the surroundings are suggestive of taste and comfort.

In his reli

Mr. Sulloway is a man of sanguine temperament, of strong physical constitution, vigorous mental powers, and indomitable energy, and labors persistently in any work which he undertakes, whether in business or politics. Ardent in his attachments, social and generous, he has many warm personal friends, which accounts in part, for the large vote he always receives in his town and vicinity when a candidate for office. gious sentiments Mr. Sulloway is liberal, having been reared in the Universalist faith, while his wife is a Unitarian. In all matters pertaining to the public welfare he always manifests a strong interest, and is among the foremost in supporting and carrying out all reasonable projects of local improvement. In this respect the town of Franklin is highly favored, numbering among its citizens many public-spirited men, to whose efforts, along with its superior natural advantages, it owes the prominent position it now occupies among the flourishing manufacturing towns of the State.

[ocr errors][merged small]

BY HON. GEORGE W. NESMITH.

In this centennial period it becomes our duty to put in our claim in behalf of the brave men of New Hampshire who participated in the two memorable struggles under General Gates of September 19th and October 7th, preliminary to the important surrender of General Burgoyne and his army on the 17th of the same October, 1777. The truth of history will allow us to claim for our men, who then fought, a more prominent place than has generally been assigned to them. A brief statement of the recorded facts as they occurred on those eventful days, we think, will justify our position, without reflecting any injustice upon those distinguished men from other States who so bravely and successfully co-operated with us. As safe authority, we rely much upon the historical record of General James Wilkinson, as published in the second volume of his "Memoirs of his own Times." He acted under General Gates as Deputy Adjutant General of the Northern Army, and was an eye witness to many of the events described by him, had good means of knowing the truth, communicated the orders of the Commanding General, and has left for our guidance a faithful official record of the troops ordered into each battle, and cspecially a full return under his hand of the killed, wounded and missing of each Corps engaged in the battle of September 19th. From the evidence furnished from such sources, confirmed by other original documents, we are enabled to gather a correct comparative estimate of the achievements and sacrifices of the New Hampshire men who participated in this engagement.

This battle of September was fought almost entirely by the left wing of the American army. Wilkinson says that only about 3000 of our troops were engaged, and they were opposed by 3500

of the best men of Burgoyne's army. The battle was obstinately fought, and without immediate decisive advantages or results to either side. The ground on which they contended was broken, or uneven, and much of it covered with trees. The Americans used no cannon. The British employed a battery of about six pieces, which were taken and retaken several times, but were finally left in the possession of the enemy. Each party took and lost some prisoners. The British loss was reported to exceed 600, while the American loss in killed, wounded and missing, as returned by Wilkinson, amounted to 321. Of this number, 80 were killed, 218 wounded, and 23 missing. Of the Americans engaged, we first mention Col. Morgan's Regiment of Riflemen, not exceeding in number 400 men; second, Maj. Dearborn's Battalion of Infantry, partly made up from Whitcomb's Rangers, Col. Long's Regiment and some new volunteers, supposed to not exceed 300; third, Gen. Poor's Brigade of Infantry, which was reported on the 4th of October subsequent to the battle then to embrace 1466 men, and probably must have numbered at least 1600 in its ranks at the time of the battle. It lost 217 men in killed, wounded, etc., on that day. The balance of the troops, who took a part in the contest, was made up from Gen. Larnard's Brigade of Massachusetts troops and a detachment commanded by Col. Marshall of Patterson's Brigade. The analysis of Gen. Poor's Brigade would show about the following result: First, the three New Hampshire Continental Regiments. These Regiments had been enlisted for three years, or during the war, and organized under their several commanders early in the year 1777. Most of them had seen service in some previous campaign. The first Regiment was commanded at this time by Col. Cil

ley of Nottingham; the second by Col.
Geo. Reid of Londonderry; the third by
Col. Alexander Scammell of Durham.
The number in all these Regiments would
not exceed 1000. Their whole number
on the 28th of the preceding June was
only 1119, and the unfortunate battle had
since occurred at Hubbarton, in which
Hale's Regiment (now Reid's) had suf-
fered a severe loss of nearly 75 men
(mostly prisoners). The balance of
Gen. Poor's Brigade was made up from
Militia from Connecticut, one Regiment
of which was commanded by Col. Cook,
also by two small detachments of New
York Militia. Wilkinson says,
"The
stress of the action on our part was borne
by Morgan's Regiment and Poor's Bri-
gade." The battle commenced about
three o'clock, P. M., and continued until
dark. Each party then retired to their
respective camps. Wilkinson says also
that Larnard's Brigade went into the bat-
tle late in the day. The impetuous Gen.
Arnold complained because Gen. Gates
declined to order more troops into action.
Hence severe language passed between
them, and harsh feeling was exhibited by
both Generals.

In order to ascertain with some degree of accuracy those who actually fought the battle of September 19th, we refer to Wilkinson's Return of the whole loss in killed, wounded and missing, as assigned by him to each, and all the troops engaged on that day, according to his summary of the loss, and we believe he has reported accurately, the New Hampshire troops suffered as much, or more, in officers and men than all the others combined. The figures will show the comparative sacrifice, and to whom the honor and glory of this contest justly belong.

Morgan's Reg't lost in killed and wounded,
The New York Militia,

16

33

66

10

[blocks in formation]

32

43

58

[ocr errors]

gade, which lost, as before stated, 217— leaving 99 for the other corps belonging to this Brigade. Honorable mention should be made of Col. Cook's Regiment of Connecticut Militia, which encountered the loss of 53; Col. Latimer's Connnecticut loss, 13-66 total loss.

In this struggle New Hampshire lost many valuable officers. In Scammell's Regiment, Lieutenant-Colonel Andrew Coburn of Marlborough was killed; also Lieutenant Joseph M. Thomas and Ensign Joseph Fay of Walpole were mortally wounded. In Reid's Regiment, Lieutenant-Colonel Winborn Adams of Durham was killed. Captain Frederick M. Bell of Dover was also mortally wounded, and died in hospital soon after the battle. Lieutenant Noah Robinson of Exeter and Ensign Bell of New Castle were both wounded, but survived. In Col. Cilley's Regiment, Captain William Scott of Peterborough, Lieutenant James Gould of Groton, Lieutenant Jonathan Emerson of Dunstable and Lieutenant Barzillai Howe of Hillsborough were all wounded, and Captain Jason Waitt of Alstead and Lieutenant John Moore of Pembroke were made prisoners. In Maj. Dearborn's Battalion, Lieutenant William Read and Ensign Foster were killed, and Captain Ball was wounded.

In the next battle, of October 7th, we find the same brave men, who had so well and so obstinately fought the first, again commanded to take the field. Gen. Gates' order to Wilkinson was: "Tell Morgan to begin the game." He did begin it, attacking the enemy on the right flank. The New Hampshire troops receive and obey the next order, and are soon found both in front and on the left flank of the enemy. Wilkinson says:

"After I had delivered the order to Gen. 35 Poor, directing him to the point of attack, I was commanded to bring up Ten 160 Broeck's Brigade of New York troops, 3000 strong. I performed this service, and regained the field of battle at the moment the enemy had turned their back, only fifty-two minutes after the first shot was fired. I found the courageous Col. Cilley astraddle of a brass 12pounder, and exulting in the capture,"

28

161

It will thus be seen that New Hampshire lost, in officers and privates, 161 out of 321 men, or 118 from Poor's Bri

« AnteriorContinuar »