DA Pam, Volúmenes27-170Headquarters, Department of the Army, 2001 |
Términos y frases comunes
accepted accused accused's action active affirmed agency alleged Appeals applicable appointed armed forces Army Article board of review charged Chron Ltr cited civil civilian Code commander concerning conduct Congress considered Constitution convening authority conviction counsel court Court of Military court-martial decision defense Department determine direct discharge duty effect enlisted established evidence Executive expressed fact Federal findings forces foreign granted guilty held holding included instructions intent interest involved issue JAGA Judge Advocate judicial jurisdiction law officer limited majority matter means ment Military Appeals MILITARY JUSTICE nature objection offense opinion person personnel position practice present procedure prohibition punishment question reasonable received record regulations relating Reserve result retired rule sentence specific speech statement statute supra term tion trial UCMJ United USCMA violation
Pasajes populares
Página 39 - States may exercise the right to intervene for the preservation of Cuban independence, the maintenance of a government adequate for the protection of life, property and individual liberty, and for discharging the obligations with respect to Cuba imposed by the treaty of Paris on the United States, now to be assumed and undertaken by the Government of Cuba.
Página 33 - The United States in congress assembled shall also have the sole and exclusive right and power of regulating the alloy and value of coin struck by their own authority, or by that of the respective states: fixing the standard of weights and measures throughout the United States...
Página 39 - While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war — seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept wax rather than let it perish, and the war came.
Página 33 - The law is perfectly well settled," this Court said over fifty years ago, "that the first ten amendments to the Constitution, commonly known as the Bill of Rights, were not intended to lay down any novel principles of government, but simply to embody certain guaranties and immunities which we had inherited from our English ancestors, and which had from time immemorial been subject to certain well-recognized exceptions arising from the necessities of the case. In incorporating these principles into...
Página 33 - There are certain well-defined and narrowly limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise any Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous, and the insulting or "fighting" words — those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
Página 26 - Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces...
Página 39 - If a man vow a vow unto the LORD, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word, he shall do according to all that proceedeth out of his mouth.
Página lxxvii - ... law, has been shaped by distinctions whose validity is largely historical. Even in the area from which they derive, due consideration has led to the discarding of these distinctions in the homeland of the common law. * * * Distinctions such as those between 'lessee,' 'licensee,' 'invitee' and 'guest,' often only of gossamer strength, ought not to be determinative in fashioning procedures ultimately referable to constitutional safeguards.
Página lxxv - person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure" within Rule 41k-). one must have been a victim of a search and seizure, one against whom the search was directed, as distinguished from one who claims prejudice only through the use of evidence gathered as a consequence of a search or seizure directed at someone else.