...been prouounced, and because it was not argued at the bar. The opinion of the Court is, that there is error in the judgment of the Court below, and that the same ought to be reversed. [Co.NSTRUCTION OF STATUTE.] OTIS, Plaintiff in Error, against WALTEK, Defendant in Errar....

...been pronounced, and because it was not argued at the bar. The opinion of the Court is, that there is error in the judgment of the Court below, and that the same ought to be reversed. Judgment reversed. [CONSTRUCTION OF STATUTE.] OTIS, Plaintiff in Error, against WALTER, Defendant...

...claim. Upon the best and most mature consideration we have been able to give the subject, we think that there is no error in the judgment of the court...below, and that the same ought to be affirmed; the sheriff having sold the property by virtue of a fieri facias, issued upon the judgment of a court of...

...process. With these impressions of the law and justice of the case, we are of opinion, that there is error in the judgment of the court below, and that the same ought to be reversed. JUDGMENT HE VERSED AND PROCEDENDO AWARDED. DAVID HOFFMAN vs. PETER GOLD. — June, 1836....

...prevent future litigation, we have delivered our opinions upon both exceptions. We are of opinion, that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and that it ought to be affirmed. JUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Turner vs. Walker.— 1831. JOSIAH TURNER vs. JAMES WALKER.—...

...assembly on T the subject a careful examination, from which we arrive Lockhart , , . , , . .... at the conclusion, that there is no error in the judgment of the circuit court- The act of 1801, ch. 10, was passed to provide for the collection of taxes in cases...

...have been within the statute of Frauds, as was the case of Nichol vs. Lytle. Upon the whole, we think there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and order that it be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. PARTEE vs. CAUGHRAN, An eiecutordt ion tort cannot retain...

...outstanding title in a third person to defeat the recovery of such purchaser. We therefore are of opinion that there is no error in the judgment of the court below, and direct that it be affirmed. TURNER vs. LUMBRICK. PLEADllTO. Parties — tenants in common. One tenant...

...Makute i£^Co. Townson vs. Moore. vs. Hathaway, 3 Stewart's R. 29, and Chapman vs. Arrington, ib. 480.) There is no error in the judgment of the court below, and it is affirmed. TOWNSON VS. MOORE. 1. It is no objection, since special demurrers have been dispensed...

...does not bear out the last position of the opposite counsel. He then argued the following points: 1. That there is no error in the judgment of the court below, as rendered ; and if there be, it cannot be corrected or reversed here, in the form presented by the...