 | Lawrence Lewis, Adelbert Hamilton, John Houston Merrill, William Mark McKinney, James Manford Kerr, John Crawford Thomson - 1833 - 812 páginas
...damages as the circumstances require." , . . To do this, however, there must have been some wilful misconduct, or that entire want of care which would...train, and the court, therefore, misdirected the jury. In the case at bar the facts are few and simple. The plaintiff, who was a boy of 13 years of age, relates... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1876 - 802 páginas
...accident. But the absence of this care, whether called gross or ordinary negligence, did not authorize the jury to visit the company with damages beyond the...actually inflicted. To do this, there must have been some wilful misconduct, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious indifference... | |
 | 1876 - 668 páginas
...damages beyond the limit of compensation for the injury inflicted. To do this there must be some wilful misconduct, or that entire want of care which would...presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences. Judgment reversed. Opinion by Davis, J. NEGOTIABLE PAPER. SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. First National... | |
 | 1913 - 1050 páginas
...accident. But the absence of this care, whether called gross or ordinary negligence, did not authorize the jury to visit the company with damages beyond the...this, there must have been some willful misconduct, or tliat entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences.... | |
 | 1880 - 920 páginas
...accident. But the absence of this care, whether called gross or ordinary negligence, did not authorize the jury to visit the company with damages beyond the...actually inflicted. To do this, there must have been some wilful misconduct, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious indifference... | |
 | 1893 - 1094 páginas
...required to avoid the accident, "whether called 'gross' or 'ordinary' negligence, did not authorize the Jury to visit the company with damages beyond the...Nothing of this kind can be imputed to the persons hi charge of the tram; and the court, therefore, misdirected the jury." 91 US 495. In Railway Co. v.... | |
 | Isaac Grant Thompson - 1884 - 880 páginas
...act or word of insult or contumely — any intentional violation of the plaintiff's rights, — any " willful misconduct, or that entire want of care which...presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences." Milwaukee & Sf. Paul Railway v. Arms, 91 U. S. 489. Waiving the question whether the rule of damages... | |
 | John Fletcher Lacey - 1884 - 1404 páginas
...Cobb, 68 III., 53, 1873. 47. — Negligence alone is not to be visited with punitive damages. Wilful misconduct, or that entire want of care which would...presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences, is necessary to support such damages. Kansas Pacific R'y Co. v. Lundin, 8 Colo., 94. 1876. 48. —... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 1072 páginas
...accident. But the absence of this care, whether called gross or ordinary negligence, did not authorize the jury to visit the Company with damages beyond the...inflicted. To do this, there must have been some willful misconduct,orthat entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious indifference... | |
| |
To do this, there must have been some wilful misconduct, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of a conscious indifference to consequences. 
