Cages of Reason: The Rise of the Rational State in France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain
University of Chicago Press, 1993 - 487 páginas
Blending political, historical, and sociological analysis, Bernard S. Silberman offers a provocative explanation for the bureaucratic development of the modern state. The study of modern state bureaucracy has its origins in Max Weber's analysis of the modes of social domination, which Silberman takes as his starting point.
Whereas Weber contends that the administration of all modern nation-states would eventually converge in one form characterized by rationality and legal authority, Silberman argues that the process of bureaucratic rationalization took, in fact, two courses. One path is characterized by permeable organizational boundaries and the allocation of information by "professionals." The other features well-defined boundaries and the allocation of information by organizational rules. Through case studies of France, Japan, the United States, and Great Britain, Silberman demonstrates that this divergence stems from differences in leadership structure and in levels of uncertainty about leadership succession in the nineteenth century.
Silberman concludes that the rise of bureacratic rationality was primarily a response to political problems rather than social and economic concerns. Cages of Reason demonstrates how rationalization can have occurred over a wide range of cultures at various levels of economic development. It will be of considerable interest to readers in a number of disciplines: political science, sociology, history, and public administration.
"Silberman has produced an invaluable, densely packed work that those with deep knowledge of public administrative development will find extremely rewarding." —David H. Rosenbloom, American Political Science Review
"An erudite, incisive, and vibrant book, the product of intensive study and careful reflection. Given its innovative theoretical framework and the wealth of historical materials contained in it, this study will generate debate and stimulate research in sociology, political science, and organizational theory. It is undoubtedly the best book on the comparative evolution of the modern state published in the last decade."—Mauro F. Guillen, Contemporary Sociology
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Organization Theory and Bureaucratic Structure
Political Uncertainty Leadership Succession and the Modes of Administration
The Strategies of Uncertainty
Revolutionary Change and Structural Ambiguity The Revolutionary and Napoleonic Transformations
The PostNapoleonic Period
The Meiji Restoration as the Revolutionary Moment
The Resolution of Revolutionary Uncertainty and the Imperial State
Political Parties Patronage and Administration
absence accountability administrative appears appointment authority basic basis became become bureaucratic capacity career central century character choices civil service claim Commission commitment consequence considerable constitution continued created creation decision defined determining direct distinct dominated early emerged equality especially established examination executive existence function higher imperial incentives individual institutions knowledge least levels lower major means meant ment ministers Napoleon nature nineteenth organization organizational Parliament parliamentary party party leaders patronage period political leaders political leadership positions possible predictable problem produced professional public interest rank rationalization recruitment reduce reflected reform regulations relatively result role rules schools seems seen selection senior served social society sought specific status strategy structure succession systematic tion Treasury uncertainty University upper voters