character, wish above all things to imitate it in every imitable perfection? If the enmity of the carnal mind discover itself in refusing subjection to the law of God, when that enmity is slain, and friendship restored, must not the will of God become the will of the man? Can he hear the divine command without echoing back, that to love God "with all the heart, and with all the understand

ing, and with all the soul, and with all the "strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, " is more than all burnt-offerings." If" his eyes "are turned away from beholding vanity," to the contemplation of divine excellence, greatness, and grace, must not his soul expand with the enlarged prospect before him, and in a manner partake of the divine nature? If he is made wise, spiritually to understand, and faithfully to trace the ways of providence; if he thus perceives, that "God is "good to all, and that his tender mercies are over "all his other works,-that he makes his sun to "shine and his rain to descend on the just, and "the unjust,—that his eyes go to and fro to show "himself mighty, in behalf of those whose hearts "are perfect towards him;" must not love to so bountiful a benefactor, effectually prompt him "to do good to all, especially to those of the

"household of faith, yea to be merciful as his "Father in heaven is merciful ?" When his divinely illuminated mind takes all these views of God, as arising from, and connected with the grand scheme of man's salvation, how is his heart enlarged and moved with generous sentiments ? Can he think of " God so loving the world, as to

give his only begotten Son," and with-hold any possible return of affection and duty? Can he contemplate, and experience "the grace of our "Lord Jesus, in becoming poor to make many "rich," without feeling and exerting at once all the warmth of gratitude and of a similar benevolence? Having the divine character strongly represented to his mind by the Spirit of truth, "the "desire of his soul is henceforth towards him,

and the remembrance of his name:" he feels and confesses indeed that his goodness cannot extend to an object infinitely glorious, but, in the highest admiration and love, of this supreme, divine perfection and grace, he is ambitious to imitate these in the exercise of all goodness "the saints, as the excellent ones of the earth," yea, and to all his fellow-men: His own enemies, and the irreligious and profane are not excluded from his benevolent regards.

❝ to

In the Second place, the man of liberal charity is one who gives cheerfully according to his ability. The sacred oracles teach us that charity is not so much to be measured by what we give, as by the proportion which it bears to our circumstances in life, and the manner in which we bestow it. We find a most instructive piece of history to this purpose in Mark xii. 41. where our Lord takes notice of the contributions made to the public treasury. None are censured for neglect, nay, it is granted that "the rich gave "much." But notwithstanding this show of liberality, a poor widow who only gave in two mites, receives his distinguished approbation. Her offering was in itself insignificant.-But what saith the unerring Judge? ver. 43, 44. "He called "unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, "verily I say unto you, that this poor widow hath "cast more in than all they which have cast into "the treasury. For all they did cast in of their "abundance; but she of her want did cast in all "that she had, even all her living."—A judgment founded not on the outward appearance of things, but on the relations which these several offerings bore to the real circumstances of the donors, and the motives from which they acted. A similar

C

66

decision is given, 2 Cor. viii. 12. where the apostle declares, that, "if there be first a willing mind, it "is accepted according to that a man hath, and "not according to that he hath not." This too is the plain import of the direction in his first epistle to the Corinthians, chap. xvi. 1, 2. "Now "concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given order to the churches of Galatia, even so "do ye; upon the first day of the week, let every "one of you lay by him in store, as God hath "prospered him," By the exhortation immediately following our text, the apostle gives this very account of liberal charity. "Every man according as he purposeth in his heart, so let "him give, not grudgingly, or of necessity, for "God loveth a cheerful giver." Thus we are taught to estimate charity by a comparative view of it with our worldly substance and our disposi. tions. Let not persons in affluence value themselves as truly liberal, because upon some occasions they have contributed largely to the support of their indigent brethren, but let them inquire whether their charity corresponds to their abundance, and whether even what they give is extorted, or freely and most cheerfully parted with. Let not these in inferior stations and circumstances

think themselves excused from this duty, as being, in their own opinion, incapable of affording any useful or decent assistance to the destitute and afflicted. But let them remember the widow's mite, as not only accepted, but esteemed by the best judge of the worth of actions, a richer offering than the vast sums which the rich gave out of their abundance. He who blessed to the widow of Zarephath her handful of meal and cruise of oil, with permanent virtue, to nourish her and her son, can, in ways unknown to us, and to an extent of usefulness inconceivable by us, enrich with his blessing the smallest offerings. I mean not by this to state an invidious comparison between the rich and the poor, to reduce the value of what is done by the former, and magnify the services of the latter; but to show that in either situation, the character I am describing may be, and is in fact most truly and honourably maintained, when it bears a just proportion to our worldly stock and prosperity, and when we "freely give as having "freely received." I have joined the ability and inclination to do good, because both must be seriously attended to in the proper exercise of charity, to distinguish it on the one hand from the thoughtless profusion of the prodigal, and, on