 | United States. Supreme Court, John Chandler Bancroft Davis, Henry Putzel, Henry C. Lind, Frank D. Wagner - 1979 - 996 páginas
...the other does not." 284 US, at 304 (emphasis added). More recently, we framed the test as whether " 'each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not. . . .'" Brown v. Ohio, supra, at 166, quoting Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass. 433, 434 (1871) (emphasis... | |
 | Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1922 - 836 páginas
...same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes ; and if each statute requires...does not, an acquittal or conviction under either does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other." Morey v. Commonwealth,... | |
 | 1890 - 542 páginas
...same act, but whether be has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes; and, if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other docs not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution... | |
 | 1874 - 844 páginas
...Although proof of one particular fact is necessary to a conviction under either oí two statutes, yet if each statute requires proof of an additional fact...does not, an acquittal or conviction under either is no bar to the prosecution and punishment under the other: Morey v. Commonwealth, 108 Mass., 433.... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1884 - 550 páginas
...put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes; and if the statute requires proof of an additional fact, which the other does not, an acquittal does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other:" Morey v. Commonwealth,... | |
 | 1921 - 1056 páginas
...same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes, and If each statute requires...from prosecution and punishment under the other." See, also, Carter v. McClaughry, 183 US 365, 394, 395, 22 Sup. Ct. 181, 46 L. Ed. 236; Burton v. US,... | |
 | 1902 - 988 páginas
...same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense , designated by odd number The sentence, then, of fine and imprisonment, was justified by the convictions of the first and second... | |
 | 1915 - 600 páginas
...same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes ; and if each statute requires...from prosecution and punishment under the other." In State v. Robinson (116 NC 1046) the same test was involved. The indictment was for carrying a concealed... | |
 | 1912 - 624 páginas
...same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense. A single act may be an offense against two statutes ; and if each statute requires...from prosecution and punishment under the other." Starting out with the above as an authoritative statement of the law involved, and assuming the disorderly... | |
| |
The test is not, whether the defendant has already been tried for the same act, but whether he has been put in jeopardy for the same offense, .A single act may be an offense against two statutes; and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact... 
