Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

from one of them will well depict the general frame of his mind on the prospect of dissolution.

"The solemn moment is at length arrived. 1 look forward to it with awe, but by no means without hope. The views of Christianity which I have long entertained have afforded the rule of my life, and will be my consolation in the hour of death.'

"He had for some years expressed his wish that his dismission might be easy, or in his own words, that he might be let gently down. His wish was granted. After having taken some refreshment with considerable relish, he caught hold of the servant's arm, and closed a long, honourable and useful life, without a struggle or a groan."

Dr. Cogan's "mental constitution was singularly happy. He viewed every thing in the most favourable light, and contrived to extract something of satisfaction from those little vexations which discompose and irritate ordinary minds. Qualities were combined in him which do not often exist in union. Though his vivacity enlivened all who enjoyed his society, he invariably pronounced gravity to be his character, saying, that through life he had been grave for himself, and cheerful for his friends. His wit, which remained with him to the last, was so chastened by a natural sweetness of temper, that it was never exercised to give pain to any human creature, and his playfulness, which might have appeared inconsistent with

habits of sober thought, was the ebul

lition of the moment, which immediately left his mind at liberty to collect its energies for serious reflection. Reflection indeed was his favourite occupation, as his writings seem sufficiently to testify. And the subjects on which he reflected most, because they appeared to him to be most closely connected with human happiness, were morals and religion. And the moral principles which it was the chief object of his literary labours to inculcate, had a constant influence on his own mind, and in their practical effect pervaded the general tenor of his life.'

It may be truly said that benevolence was the habitual affection of his mind. Of this a signal proof has been

already recorded; and many equally decisive proofs might be adduced from his private life. He professed to love his species, and knew it to be the first ambition of his life to promote their welfare. To his latest moment be was emyloyed in a scheme for the benefit of one of his relatives, concerning which he said with great emphasis; that, if he succeeded, he should finish well.

As a writer Dr. Cogau occupies a middle, but truly respectable rank. His style is unpretending; sometimes it is adorned with the simple graces; and examples might be pointed out of passages where the fervor of his mind has raised him to a strain of rich and powerful eloquence.

His frequent residence on the Continent, where the French is a sort of universal language, led him into a familiarity with all the more eminent writers of that tongue. The celebrated French preachers were his favourite authors: their onction was congenial with his own taste.

He seems not to have consulted profit in his publications. He has allowed more than one cheap edition of his most popular work, the Letters to Wilberforce, to be printed for the use of the Unitarian Book Societies. [The Editor regrets that the remainder of this Memoir must be deferred till the next Number.]

Tribute to the Memory of the late Mr. G. W. Meadley.

SIR,

IN

N the concluding Number of your former Volume, [XIII. 772,] you have noticed the death of your late occasional Correspondent, my very worthy friend, Mr. G. W. Meadley. It will, probably, be interesting to many of your readers to peruse, in the mean time, the following tribute to his memory, delivered on the Sunday evening after his funeral, by the respectable person who usually con

These are his own words, in the Preface, p. xxiii. of the 2nd Volume on the Passions.

+ Mr. THOMAS GRAHAM, shoemaker. We copy, for the sake as well of example as of information, the short account of this society, inserted in a "Historical and Descriptive View of Sunderland and the Two Wearmouths," now publishing in numbers,

ducts the worship of a small society of Unitarian Christians in Sunderland;

and the rather, as it was furnished to the work by Mr. Meadley. "In an age of free inquiry, when the legislature bas judiciously repealed those intolerant laws, by which Unitarians were exposed to pains and penalties for exercising the inalienable right of private judgment in the interpretation of the Scriptures, it might naturally be expected that some progress would be made among the inhabitants of this neighbourhood, to ascertain the proper object of religious worship, and the unequivocal doctrines of divine revelation. Accord

ingly several persons who, in the course of their inquiries, had successively imbibed those views of Christianity which, though sanctioned by the authority of Lardner, Jebb and Priestley, have frequently been confounded with an express denial of the authority of Scripture, began to meet in their own houses for religious worship and discussion. Their numbers increasing, they, in the autumn of 1814, took and registered for public service, at the Michaelmas Quarter Sessions, a large room in Maling's Rigg, formerly occupied as a Freemasons' Lodge.

"They believe in the sole Deity and Supremacy of God the Father, whom alone they regard as the proper object of religious worship, to the exclusion of every other person, being, mode or distinction whatsoever. Confessing Jesus Christ to be the Saviour of the world, they consider him to be the messenger, son and servant of God, acting by Divine appointment, but essentially inferior to the Father, and as such, not entitled to religious worship. Agreeing in these fundamental principles respecting God and Christ, they allow no minor difference of opinion, in matters not essential to Christian love and morality, to disturb their union. They believe also in the duty and efficacy of repentance to obtain the forgiveness of sins from the free and unpurchased grace of God; and inculcate a constant obedience to the precepts of the gospel, as indispensable to insure a good conscience, and a well-grounded hope in the Divine mercy. And in common with their fellow-christians of every denomination, they believe in the resurrection of the dead and in a future judgment, when all men will be rewarded or punished according to their deeds. The government of this small society is independent; and not having at present a regular mi

nister, the members conduct the worship among themselves. They profess open communion, and cultivate charity with all

men." Pp. 256—8.

and by whose permission I transmit it to you.

V. F.

After the usual services of the evening, December 6, 1818.

My friends, permit me to address you on a mournful subject, in which I have no doubt but you will, equally with myself, feel interested. The death of our friend George Wilson Meadley has filled us with sorrow: such a friend is his gain. let us hope, however, that our loss in

"It would be wanting in us, who had opportunities of knowing his sentiments of Christianity, and were eyewitnesses of his conduct, were we to be silent, when so many of his highly respectable friends have so handsomely expressed their respect for his memory, and borne testimony to his public and private worth: more especially as there are not wanting those, who, although they give him credit for his general knowledge and literary attainments, more than call in question his religious opinions.

"To such I say,judge nothing before the time; and for my own part, having had an intimate acquaintance with him for upwards of five years, during which time I freely acknowledge that, although the principal religious opinions which I now hold were formed previous to our acquaintance, yet to him I am deeply indebted for my more extended religious knowledge; and shall (while I thank my heavenly Father for the helps I have received from him) cherish to the latest period of my mortal existence, that regard for his memory which, as a truly amiable man and sincere Christian, I think it deserves.

"Although, under such circunistances, it may naturally be supposed I am partial to my religious friend, yet upon the present occasion I shall endeavour to divest myself of it; and give you a faithful account of his leading views on the doctrines of Christianity, in connexion with his conduct and general Christian character.

"I have no certain data as to his

entire secession from the Established Church; I suppose it might take place about ten or twelve years ago; prin

cipally on account of the doctrine and worship of the Trinity. As he withdrew peaceably, and perhaps without publicly, at that time, giving his reasons, this excited suspicion in the religious world, and he was considered by many as verging towards Deism; than which nothing could be more false. For, though he seceded from the Church, it was with deep regret, and in despair of any sufficient reformation in these important points being effected. His secession was strictly conscientious and decided; for he could no longer allow himself to countenance, even by his presence, what in his conscience he thought wrong. "Yet he always spoke respectfully of Church-people; and not only lived on terms of intimacy with many of them, but seemed to cherish towards them, and especially towards many of their worthy and enlightened ministers, the sincerest esteem; and often regretted that the bill of the Petitioning Clergy in 1772 had been rejected by the then Parliament; which, by this time, he considered would have produced the best effects.

"Having commenced Dissenter upon principle, he appears to have become the friend and correspondent of many eminent characters among them: not to mention others, the late Dr. Disney, the present Mr. Belsham, of Essex Street, and Mr. Turner, of Newcastle, by whom he was recommended to, and became acquainted with our society in its infancy. He immediately introduced himself to us, and, with his usual frankness, avowed his sentiments. Such of you as were then united with me in our present views, will recollect the valuable and useful religious books which he generously gave for the use of the society, besides making us welcome to the use of any books in his own valuable library.

"From our first religious acquaintance he took a decided part and interest in this society: he appeared to enjoy the satisfaction of having a few with whom he could freely converse and cordially unite, on that important subject. And although, since our public meeting, we cannot say more than that he was an occasional attendant, yet we have the satisfaction to know that he approved in

general of our proceedings, and did not give his countenance to any other society in these towns.

"It may be expected that I should candidly state the reasons (that have come within my knowledge) why his attendance in this place was not more constant. Whether he was correct or not in this point of deviation, I hold it proper that every man's religious liberty should be respected, and that he should be fully persuaded in his own mind,' for 'to his own Master he standeth or falleth;' and I trust that we are the last people in the world to advance the claim of infallibility. After his secession from the Church, he, with such persons of the family as were at home, attended to religious worship, and I believe used the Reformed Book of Common Prayer. While this practice shews a mind imbued with a just sense of religion, it forcibly reminds me of the similar course we chose on our own first departure from the popular Dissenters: and such of us as have enjoyed the satisfaction arising from such a practice, will know that it is not easily foregone, even for the sake of the more public services of religion. In this practice, I have reason to believe, he continued to persevere to the last.

"Another reason existed, which, in our circumstances, was insurmountable. I believe his mind was not fully made up as to the propriety of uneducated persons, and persons in business, conducting public worship, and the services of religion; which, considering his own attainments, and allowing a little for the prejudices of others, was natural: but in this he was not tenacious. As to ourselves, we are friendly to education, and have no objection to the ministry of educated men, when and where it can be afforded yet we by no means consider their services as indispensable; as it is notorious that such men were not solely, not generally, employed by the highest authority, to call men at first to embrace and obey the Christian religion: why, then, should they be considered as indispensable now, when it is firmly founded in the world?

"Having stated the only point of deviation with our friend, which, per

haps, is but an act of justice to his character, I shall now proceed to state in what we were agreed :—generally speaking, in all the fundamental doctrines and essential principles of the gospel of Christ. To use his words, in his excellent Letters to the Bishop of St. David's, wherein he not only defends his secession, but contends with his usual ability for the right (as he considered it the duty) of every Christian, to inquire freely and fully into the meaning of the Scriptures, and remonstrates with his Lordship on the impropriety of persons being exposed to those penalties and disabilities, the loss of which, by the repeal of the persecuting laws respecting Unitarians, his Lordship deplored, and contended ought to be revived. The existence of one God, by whom all things were created; the divine mission, death and consequent resurrection of Christ; the divine authority of his precepts, revealed in the gospel; and the hope of immortality in the resurrection of the dead.' These opinions, together with considering the Father as the sole object of religious worship, and his free, unpurchased grace to the penitent, and the necessity of personal obedience to the precepts of the gospel, as indispensable to insure a good conscience, and a well-grounded hope in the Divine mercy; and a future state of rewards and punishments according to the deeds of men in the present life.

"While he defended these opinions, with a demonstration seldom equalled, he could also offer the best reasons why men should live in charity aud good-will. For, not to mention his political opinions, he had the most enlarged views of religious liberty; and, from the increasing liberality of the times, confidently anticipated the destruction of every species of intolerance and persecution; for, as he used to say, what has genuine Christianity to fear from its enemies? And if it had, the means taken to support it are by no means suitable to its spirit and character, which enjoins upon its followers, to do unto all men as they wish others should do towards them.

"These enlightened views of the Christian religion saved him from the

baneful influence of vulgar errors. His ideas of the Divine character and government were most extensive and exalted; and while he was neither enthusiast nor fanatic, yet his religious views were to him a fund of happiness and pleasure, which, added to the natural cheerfulness of his temper, gave a cheerful and agreeable turn to his conversation, a quality seldom combined with the character of studious men.

"To these remarks I shall only add his golden rule in ascertaining reli gious truth: What is clearly and explicitly taught in the Scriptures, or is the plain and undoubted inference therefrom, ought to be considered as the fundamental principle and ground of interpretation for that which is less explicit or more difficult.' For, as he used to say, no religious opinion should contradict the general current of the Scriptures.'

"With respect to the social and relative duties, the public respect, in addition to what I have stated, bears ample testimony to the one, and his attention to his mother and sisters, their union and felicity, sufficiently speak the other. They will severely feel his loss. We can only offer our sincere condolence, and pray the God of all consolation to support them under this bereavement. And we hope it will be no small alleviation of their affliction, that his mortal career, though short, was with credit and honour.

"I have thus stated a few particulars respecting the religious course of this excellent man. It remains for us to shew the same manly and decided character. Let our minds be free to the impressions of truth, and eagerly seek for it. When found, let us honestly confess it, and dissent upon principle: at the same time forgetting not to cultivate Christian charity towards those who differ from us, as well as amongst ourselves. Pursuing this path, let us strive to perfect the Christian character, and cherish the hope that, at another day, according to the promises of the gospel, all the good and virtuous of every nation and sect shall be re-united in a holy, happy and immortal state, where separation will be no more."

(9)

THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN LOCKE AND LIMBORCH, TRANSLATED,

I

SIR,

WITH HISTORICAL NOTES.

Clapton, January 10, 1819. SEND you a continuation of the translation of Locke and Limborch's letters. Some of those which will probably appear in your present Volume, contain profound discussions of metaphysical questions; on which a translator is in no small danger of sometimes misunderstanding his original. Should any of your Correspondents detect such mistakes, I shall be obliged by their sending you their corrections.

J. T. RUTT. ·

The Correspondence between Locke and
Limborch, 1685-1704.

I

(Continned from p. 675, Vol. XIII.)

No. 34.

Amsterdam, Oct. 8, 1697.
Philip à Limborch to John Locke.
MY WORTHY Friend,
WROTE

you, in March last, a very long letter. During the summer I have conversed with some of our principal literati, on various topics. Among these the conversation turned on the Treatise,* of which you have already received my opinion. They all highly commended it. One, indeed, was dissatisfied with the title, as not commensurate to the dignity of the subject. He said, that the Author had pursued a different course to that of most writers, who gave magnificent names to works of little importance. He, on the contrary, had prefixed a very unassuming title to a book of weighty argument. Yet, surely, the title should rather correspond to the importance of the work, that it may invite a perusal.

Another person (the same who formerly introduced to you, our Slade, this I hint only to yourself) said that he had read that Treatise twice. He praised it highly, and declared that the Author had satisfactorily proved, what was the principal argument of his book-the design of the Christian Revelation. He only wished, that in

Reasonableness of Christianity. See Vol. XIII. pp. 610, 612.

VOL. XIV.

stead of controverting, in the Introduction, the vulgar notion of Original Sin, he had left that opinion untouched, or at least not made it so prominent, in his Treatise. For now many who are strongly attached to that doctrine, stumble at the threshhold, before they reach the main argument of the book. They, indeed, entertain such prejudices against the Author that they cannot read, with the calm consideration required, his further arguments, and thus become hostile. Their good-will should rather have been conciliated, that they might have come with an unbiassed judgment to consider an opinion, which, however true, yet little accords with the sentiments of most theologians. These generally desire to add something of their own to the Christian faith, which they regard as the exclusive property of their party. To disabuse them of this error, it is necessary to allure them, instead of alienating their minds by at once proposing some dogma, which they regard as highly disputable. I freely tell you what passed on this subject.

Our discourse, as frequently happens, turned on other topics; among the rest, by what arguments the unity of God could be most satisfactorily established.

That eminent person, whom I last mentioned, declared that he wished to see some irrefragable arguments, by which it might be proved that an eternal, self-existent and all-perfect Being, can be only one. He wished to see something in the manner of Hugo Grotius, in his first book on the Truth of the Christian Religion; adding, that he had heard of a French translation of your Essay on the Human Understanding, which he wished very much to see, as he had a great opinion of your judgment. He inquired of me, whether in that Essay you had established

Sect. iii. Deum esse unum.

This was afterwards executed, under the Author's inspection, by Coste, and will be further noticed in this correspondence. с

« AnteriorContinuar »