First Statement on the Part of Great Britain, According to the Provisions of the Convention Concluded Between Great Britain and the United States, on the 29th September, 1827: For Regulating the Reference to Arbitration of the Disputed Points of Boundary Under the Fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent : For Regulating the Reference to Arbitration of the Disputed Points of Boundary Under the Fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent, Volumen2 |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 8
Página 80
... and therefore perfectly well known to the negotiators , that no point or part of
the due North line aforesaid , South of the River St. John , did or could divide ,
from each other , any rivers whatever , but some branches of the said River St.
John .
... and therefore perfectly well known to the negotiators , that no point or part of
the due North line aforesaid , South of the River St. John , did or could divide ,
from each other , any rivers whatever , but some branches of the said River St.
John .
Página 82
The designation was correct , since , guided by Mitchell's Map , the framers of the
treaty must have considered any of its nameless upper branches , as equally
entitled to the appellation of Connecticut River . And it has already been
observed ...
The designation was correct , since , guided by Mitchell's Map , the framers of the
treaty must have considered any of its nameless upper branches , as equally
entitled to the appellation of Connecticut River . And it has already been
observed ...
Página 83
The term “ North - westernmost ” necessarily implies a selection between at least
the respective suurces of two distinct branches . One of these might have
received the exclusive designation of “ Main Connecticut ; " and the source of the
other ...
The term “ North - westernmost ” necessarily implies a selection between at least
the respective suurces of two distinct branches . One of these might have
received the exclusive designation of “ Main Connecticut ; " and the source of the
other ...
Página 84
Her claim rests on the double assertion , that the Lake branch of the Connecticut
River was , at the date of the treaty of 1783 , known by the distinctive name of “
Main Connecticut ; ” and that this fact was known to the framers of the Treaty .
Her claim rests on the double assertion , that the Lake branch of the Connecticut
River was , at the date of the treaty of 1783 , known by the distinctive name of “
Main Connecticut ; ” and that this fact was known to the framers of the Treaty .
Página 85
most head of Con Thus all the information that Mr. Tiarks could collect , in support
of the British pretension , was , that the Lake Branch was called Connecticut , or
the Main Connecticut River . necticut River , as early as the year 1790 , that is to ...
most head of Con Thus all the information that Mr. Tiarks could collect , in support
of the British pretension , was , that the Lake Branch was called Connecticut , or
the Main Connecticut River . necticut River , as early as the year 1790 , that is to ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
according acknowledged acts actually American angle of Nova appears asserted Atlantic Ocean Bay of Fundy boundary line branch Britain British Statement Brunswick called Canada claim clause Commissioners Commissions common Connecticut River considered course Croix cross defined described designated direction distinct divide the rivers doubt due North line East embrace expressions extend fact fall formed framers Government Governor Grant ground Gulf of St head height of land highlands which divide Hill included inlets instance intended intersection John known Lake land latitude Lawrence Madawaska Mars Massachusetts meaning mentioned miles Mitchell's Map mountains mouth negotiators North-west angle Nova Scotia object observed Penobscot Portage portion proof proved Province Quebec question reason reference respect ridge River St rivers that empty says South specific surveyed Surveyor term termination territory treaty of 1783 true United waters West Western whole Written Evidence
Información bibliográfica
| Título | First Statement on the Part of Great Britain, According to the Provisions of the Convention Concluded Between Great Britain and the United States, on the 29th September, 1827: For Regulating the Reference to Arbitration of the Disputed Points of Boundary Under the Fifth Article of the ..., Volumen2 First Statement on the Part of Great Britain, According to the Provisions of the Convention Concluded Between Great Britain and the United States, on the 29th September, 1827: For Regulating the Reference to Arbitration of the Disputed Points of Boundary Under the Fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent : For Regulating the Reference to Arbitration of the Disputed Points of Boundary Under the Fifth Article of the Treaty of Ghent, Great Britain |
| Autor | Great Britain |
| Editor | J. Harrison & Son, 1829 |
| Procedencia del original | National Library of the Netherlands |
| Digitalizado | 15 Mar 2013 |
| Largo | 346 páginas |
| Exportar cita | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |