Congressional Communication: Content and Consequences
University of Michigan Press, 2009 M12 10 - 160 páginas
"Lipinski's impressive analysis of members' communications with constituents yields major insights about partisanship, effects on reelection prospects, and constituent evaluations."
--Bruce Oppenheimer, Vanderbilt University
"The communication between representatives and their constituents is where election strategy and policy explanations are merged and, until now, we have had only anecdotal evidence. Lipinski's book sheds light on this important part of American political life."
--David Brady, Stanford University
Congressional Communication challenges the notion that legislators "run against Congress" by routinely denigrating the institution. Using a unique, systematic analysis of the communication from members of Congress to their constituents over a five-year period, Daniel Lipinski challenges this notion, demonstrating key partisan differences in representatives' portrayals of congressional activities. While members of the majority party tend to report that the institution-and, hence, their party-is performing well, members of the minority party are more likely to accuse Congress of doing a poor job.
The findings in Congressional Communication offer the first strong empirical evidence from the electoral arena in support of controversial party government theories. Moving beyond previous studies that look only at legislators' messages, Lipinski's research also reveals the effects of these politically strategic claims on voters, whose interpretations don't necessarily bear out the legislators' intended effects.
Daniel Lipinski is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Tennessee.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
able actions addition approval attacking average behavior believe budget build chapter claim communication Congress congressional congressional performance congruence consider constituents critical Democrats demonstrate district districtwide effect effort election electoral evaluations evidence examine expected explain factors favor goal gridlock groups House impact important incentives included increase indicates individual institution interest issues judgments Key Vote leaders leadership legislation less look loyalty majority party Majority Support Score mass mailings mean measure members send minority ndings negative messages of‹ce opinion partisan passed percent percentage Persian pieces political positive messages Probability processes reasons received reelection regarding representatives Republicans Resolution respondents running against Congress Security send positive seniority sent serve shows signi‹cant speci‹c stituents strategy suggest survey TABLE targeted mail theories tion variable views vote voters Wins