Reports of Civil and Criminal Cases Decided by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1785-1951, Volumen12;Volumen75
Kentucky. Court of Appeals, James Hughes, Achilles Sneed, Martin D. Hardin, George Minos Bibb, Alexander Keith Marshall, William Littell, Thomas Bell Monroe, John James Marshall, James Greene Dana, Benjamin Monroe, James P. Metcalfe, Alvin Duvall, William Pope Duvall Bush, John Rodman, Edward Warren Hines, Charles Cyrus Turner, Thomas Lewis Edelen, Thomas Robert McBeath, Robert G. Higdon, T. M. Jones, Amos Hall Eblen
J. Bradford, 1877
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
action alleged amount answer appellant appellee applied appointed attachment authority Bank benefit bond bound Bush cause charge charter CIRCUIT COURT CITED Civil Code claim common Commonwealth constitution construction contract copy creditors damages death debt deed defendant DELIVERED THE OPINION direct Douglass earnings effect enforce entitled equity evidence execution fact failed filed give given hands heirs held hold homestead husband improvement instruction intended interest issue John JUDGE judgment jurisdiction jury land liable lien Louisville March Morris mortgage necessary notice object operate opinion owner paid parties payment person petition plaintiff possession present principal proceedings proper prove purchaser question Railroad Company reason receiver record recover rendered rents reversed road rule secure sold statute street sufficient suit sureties taken tion trustee unless wife
Página 321 - And the said records and judicial proceedings, authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of the State from whence the said records are or shall be taken.
Página 23 - We know of no case, in which a legislative act to transfer the property of A to B, without his consent, has ever been held a constitutional exercise of legislative power in any State in the Union. On the contrary, it has been constantly resisted as inconsistent with just principles, by every judicial tribunal in which it has been attempted to be enforced.
Página 704 - In an action by a mortgagee for the foreclosure of his mortgage and sale of the mortgaged property, where it appears that the .mortgaged property is in danger of being lost, removed, or materially injured, or that the condition of the mortgage has not been performed, and that the property is probably insufficient to discharge the mortgage debt; 3.
Página 110 - That no man, or set of men, are entitled to exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the community, but in consideration of public services; which not being descendible, neither ought the offices of Magistrate, Legislator, or Judge, to be hereditary.
Página 320 - In pleading a judgment or other determination of, or proceeding before a court or officer of special jurisdiction, it is...
Página 244 - If, without sufficient excuse, the defendant neglects to appear for arraignment or for trial or judgment, or upon any other occasion when his presence in court may be lawfully required, or to surrender himself in execution of the judgment, the court must direct the fact to be entered upon its minutes, and the undertaking of bail, or the money deposited instead of bail, as the case may be, must thereupon be declared forfeited.
Página 83 - The taking of bail consists in the acceptance, by a competent court or magistrate, of the undertaking of sufficient bail for the appearance of the defendant, according to the terms of the undertaking, or that the bail will pay to the people of this State a specified sum.
Página 277 - But the point might have been shortly dismissed with this safe declaration, that there is no direct constitutional inhibition upon the States, nor any clause in the Constitution, from which it can be even plausibly inferred that the States may not legislate upon the remedy in suits upon the judgments of other States, exclusive of all interference with their merits.
Página 241 - No indictment is insufficient, nor can the trial, judgment, or other proceedings thereon be affected, by reason of a defect or imperfection in matter of form, which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant, upon the merits.