Does Human Rights Need God?
When the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was drafted in 1945, French Catholic philosopher Jacques Maritain observed, "We agree on these rights, providing we are not asked why. With the 'why,' the dispute begins." The world since then has continued to agree to disagree, fearing that an open discussion of the divergent rationales for human rights would undermine the consensus of the Declaration. Is it possible, however, that current failures to protect human rights may stem from this tacit agreement to avoid addressing the underpinnings of human rights?
This consequential volume presents leading scholars, activists, and officials from four continents who dare to discuss the "why" behind human rights. Appraising the current situation from diverse religious perspectives -- Jewish, Protestant, Orthodox, Muslim, Confucian, and secular humanist -- the contributors openly address the question whether God is a necessary part of human rights. Despite their widely varying commitments and approaches, the authors affirm that an investigation into the "why" of human rights need not devolve into irreconcilable conflict.
Contributors: Khaled Abou El Fadl
Elizabeth M. Bucar
Jean Bethke Elshtain
Robert P. George
Courtney W. Howland
Robert A. Seiple
Max L. Stackhouse
Anthony C. Yu
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.
Enduring Change Confucianism and the Prospect of Human Rights
Natural Law and Human Rights A Conversation
Religion Religions and Human Rights
The IsraeliPalestinian Conflict of Rights Is God the Only Problem?
God the Devil and Human Rights A South African Perspective
What Kind of God Does Human Rights Require?
Religious Freedom A Legacy to Reclaim
The Challenge of Religious Fundamentalism to the Liberty and Equality Rights of Women An Analysis under the United Nations Charter
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
according action Africa American argued argument authority become belief called Charter Chinese Christian civil claims commitment concept concern considered constitutional context cultural democracy democratic dignity discrimination discussing distinction divine doctrine duty equality ethical example existence fact faith freedom Fundamentalism fundamentalist God's grounds groups Hindu human rights husband idea important individual institutions interpretation Islamic issue jurists justice limited live marriage matter means moral movement Muslim nature norms obedience obligation particular person philosophical political possible practice Press principles protect question reason recognized regard relations reli religion religious freedom requires respect response role rule ruler secular sense Shari'ah social society South supra note term theological thought tion tradition understanding United Universal Declaration values violation Western wife women