Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

and 36 Vict. c. 60. The election judges under the last described Act appoint a number of barristers, not exceed ing five, to try such petitions. No barrister can be appointed who is of less than fifteen years standing, or a member of Parliament, or holder of any office of profit (other than that of recorder) under the Crown; nor can any barrister try a petition in any borough in which he is recorder or in which he resides, or which is included in his circuit. The barrister sits without a jury. The provisions are generally

[ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

ELECTRICITY

THE word Electricity is derived from the Greek word
term was
by Gilbert, who used it with reference to the attractions
and repulsions excited by friction in certain bodies of which
amber may be taken as the type. To the cause of these
forces was given the name Electricity; and out of the
study of these and kindred phenomena arose the science of
electricity, of which it is the purpose of the present article
to give a brief outline.

undressing, emitted occasionally sudden crackling sparks, burning his clothes. Such are the scanty gleanings of electrical knowledge which we derive from the ancient philosophy; and though several writers of the Middle Ages have made occasional references to these facts, and even attempted to speculate upon them, yet they added nothing to the science, and left an open field for the researches of modern philosophers.

(1540

The science has been divided into three branches- Dr Gilbert of Colchester may be considered as the Gibert, Electrostatics, which deals with electricity at rest;. Electro-founder of the science, as he appears to have been the first 16003 kinetics, which considers the passage of electricity from philosopher who carefully repeated the observations of the place to place; and Electromagnetism, which treats of the ancients, and applied to them the principles of philosophical relation of electricity to magnetism. We shall, however, investigation. In order to determine if other bodies posmake no attempt to adhere to this division, but shall sessed the same property as amber, he balanced a light metalexhibit the different parts of the subject in such order and lic needle on a pivot, and observed whether or not it was connection as seems most clear and natural in the present affected by causing the excited or rubbed body to approach state of the science. For the sake of the non-scientific to it. In this way he discovered that the following bodies reader we prefix a brief history 2 of the science of elec- possess the property of attracting light substances :tricity, wherein mention is made of some of the more amber, gagates or jet, diamond, sapphire, carbuncle, rockstriking electrical discoveries and of the steps by which crystal, opal, amethyst, vincentina or Bristol stone, beryl, our knowledge of the subject has advanced to its present glass, paste for false gems, glass of antimony, slags, condition. belemnites, sulphur, gum-mastic, sealing-wax of lac, hard resin, arsenic, rock salt, mica, and alum. These various bodies attracted, with different degrees of force, not only straws and light films, but likewise metals, stones, earths, wood, leaves, thick smoke, and all solid and fluid bodies. Among the substances which are not excited by friction Gilbert enumerated emerald, agate, carnelian, pearls, jasper, calcedony, alabaster, porphyry, coral, marble, Lydian stone, flints, hematites, smyris (emery or corundum), bones, ivory, hard woods, such as cedar, ebony, juniper, and cypress, metals, and natural magnets. Gilbert also discovered that the state of the atmosphere affects the production of electricity; dryness with north or east wind being a favourable condition, while moisture with south wind is unfavourable. An account of Gilbert's experiments will be found in his book De Magnete, lib. ii. cap. 2.

our times.

HISTORICAL SKETCH.

The name of the philosopher who first observed that Thales amber when rubbed possesses the property of attracting and repelling light bodies has not been handed down to Thales of Miletus is said to have described this remarkable property, and both Theophrastus (321 B.C.) and Pliny (70 A.D.) mention the power of amber to attract straws and dry leaves. The same authors speak of the lapis lyncurius, which is supposed to be a mineral called tourmaline, as possessing the same property. The electricity of the torpedo was also known to the ancients. Pliny informs us, that when touched by a spear it paralyzes the muscles and arrests the feet, however swift; ar 1 Animal Aristotle adds that it possesses the power of benumbing men, as well as the fishes which serve for its prey. The influence electricity on the human body, and the electricity of the human body itself, were also known in ancient times. Anthero, a freedman of Tiberius, was cured of the gout by the shocks of the torpedo; and Wolimer, the king of the Goths, was able to emit sparks A.D. from his own body. Eustathius, who records this fact, also states that a certain philosopher, while dressing and

1 De Magnets Magneticisqus Corporibus.

A portion of this historical sketch was written by Sir David Brewster, and formed the introduction to his article "Electricity" in last edition of the Encyclopædia. It has been modified by suppres sions and alterations here and there, and by large additions at the end which were thought necessary to make it suit the present state of

Briance. For the sake of the student in search of original sources of information, pretty copious reference to such has been added through out. Valuable for information of this kind the student will find Riess's Reibungs electricitat, Young's Natural Philosophy, Wiedeana's Galvanismus, and the recent work on electricity by Prof. ascart, of the Collège de France,

(1627

Robert Boyle added many new facts to the science of electricity, and he has given a full account of them in Borle. his Experiments on the Origin of Electr ity. By means of 91). a suspended needle, he discovered that amber retained its attractive virtue after the friction which excited it had ceased; and though smoothness of surface had been regarded as advantageous for excitation, yet he found a diamond which in its rough state exceeded all the polished ones and all the electrics which he had tried, having been able to move a needle three minutes after he had ceased to rub it. He found also that heat and tersion (or the cleaning or wiping of any body) increased its susceptibility of excitation; and that if the attracted body were fixed, and the attracting body movable, their mutual approach would still take place. To Gilbert's list of "electrics" Boyle added the resinous cake which remained after evaporating one-fourth part of good oil of turpentine, the dry mass which remains after distilling a mixture of petroleum and

Otto von (1602

86).

strong spirit of nitre, glass of lead, caput mortuum of amber, white sapphire, white amethyst, diaphanous ore of lead, carnelian, and a green stone supposed to be a sapphire.

To these discoveries of Boyle his contemporary Otto Guericke, von Guericke added the highly important one of electric light (Experimenta Nova Magdeburgica, lib. iv. cap. 15). Having cast a globe of sulphur in a glass sphere, and broken off the glass, he mounted the sulphur ball upon a revolving axis, and excited it by the friction of the hand. By this means he discovered that light and sound accompanied strong electrical excitation, and he compares the light to that which is exhibited by breaking lump sugar in the dark. With this powerful apparatus Guericke verified on a greater scale the results obtained by his predecessors, and obtained several new ones of very considerable importance. He found that a light body, when once attracted by an excited electric, was repelled by it, and was incapable of a second attraction until it had been touched by some other body; and that light bodies suspended within the sphere of influence of an excited electric possessed the same properties as if they had been excited.

Newton (16431727).

Hawksbee, 1705.

Stephen Gray (16961730).

To our illustrious countryman Sir Isaac Newton the science of electricity owes some important observations. He used in his electrical experiments a globe of glass rubbed by the hand instead of the sulphur globe of Von Guericke. It would appear that Newton was the first to use glass in this way (Optics, query 8th). We owe also to Sir Isaac a beautiful experiment on the excitation of electricity which has since become very popular. Having fixed a round disc of glass in a short brass cylinder, he placed small pieces of thin paper within the cylinder and upon a table, so that the lower surface of the glass was one-eighth of an inch distant from the table. He then rubbed the upper surface of the glass, and he observed the pieces of paper "leap from one part of the glass to the other, and twirl about in the air." This experiment, after a previous unsuccessful trial, was repeated by the Royal Society in 1676 (Brewster's Life of Newton, p. 307).

Francis Hawksbee, one of the most active experimental philosophers of his age, added many new facts to the science. In 1705 he communicated to the Royal Society several curious experiments on what he calls "the mercurial phosphorus." He showed that light could be produced by passing common air through mercury placed in a well-exhausted receiver. The air rushing through the mercury, blew it up against the sides of the glass that held it, "appearing all around like a body of fire, consisting of abundance of glowing globules." The phenomenon continued till the receiver was half full of air. These phenomena had been observed in the Torricellian vacuum before Hawksbee's time, and various explanaions suggested. He suspected that they were due to electricity, and remarked their resemblance to lightning. Like Newton he used a revolving glass globe rubbed by the hand to generate electricity. Besides the experiment above alluded to he made many others on the electric Jight and on the attractions of electrified bodies. Descriptions of these will be found in his Physico-Mechanical Experiments, 1709, and in several memoirs in the Philo sophical Transactions about 1707.

About the same time Dr Wall (Phil. Trans., 1708) observed the spark and crackling sound accompanying the electrical excitation of amber, and compared them to thunder and lightning.

One of the most ardent experimentalists of his time was Stephen Gray, a Fellow of the Royal Society. In his first paper, published in 1720, he showed that electricity could be excited by the friction of feathers,

hair, silk, linen, woollen, paper, leather, wood, parchment, and gold-beaters' skin. Several of these bodies exhibited light in the dark, especially after they had been warmed; but all of them attracted light bodies, and sometimes at the distance of eight or ten inches. An epoch was made in the history of electricity by the discovery of Gray in 1729, that certain bodies had, while others had not, the power of conveying electricity from one body to another, i.e., in modern phrase, conducting it. Gray experimented with a glass tube, into the ends of which were fastened two corks; into one of these he fastened a fir rod, and to the end of the rod an ivory ball. On rubbing the glass he found that the ball attracted the light bodies as vigorously as the glass itself. He made a variety of experiments with rods of different length, and with a packthread, by which he suspended his ball from the balcony of an upper story of his house, all with the same result. He then attempted to carry the electricity horizontally on a pack thread which he suspended with hempen strings but the experiment failed. On the occasion of a repetition of the experiments at the house of his friend Wheeler, silk strings were suggested as a support, and found to answer, while metal wires failed. Gray and Wheeler were thus led to the conclusion that it was the material of the supports that was in question, and that whereas packthread had, silk had not the power of transmitting electricity to a distance. Gray and Wheeler managed, by supporting a pack thread by silk loops, to convey electricity from a piece of rubbed glass to a distance of 886 feet. The conducting power of fluids, and of the human body, was established by Gray. He also made many curious experiments on the electrical properties of resinous cakes, which he allowed to cool and harden in the ladles in which they had been melted. For an account of these and others the student is referred to memoirs in the Philosophical Trunsactions for 1731, 1735, &c.

[blocks in formation]

(1699

While Gray was pursuing his career of discovery in Dufay England, M. Dufay, of the Academy of Sciences, and su- 1739) perintendent of the Royal Botanic Gardens, was actively employed in the same researches. He found that all bodies, whether solid or fluid, could be electrified by an excited tube, by setting them on a glass stand slightly warmed, or only dried; and that those bodies which are in themselves least electrical received the greatest degree of electricity from the approach of the glass tube. He repeated the experiments of Gray, confirining his results, and found that electricity was transinitted more easily along packthread when it was wetted, and that it might be supported upon glass tubes in place of silk lines. In this way he conveyed it along a string 1256 feet long. He suspended by silken strings and electrified a child as Gray had done; and having suspended himself in a similar manner, he discovered that an electrical spark, accompanied with a crackling noise, took place when any other person touched him, and he has described the prickling sensation like the burning from a spark of fire, which is at the same time felt either through the clothes or on the skin. The great discovery of Dufay, however, was that of two different kinds of electricity. He fully recognized the importance of this fundamental Vitr fact, and gave the name of vitreous electricity to that which and is produced by exciting glass, rock-crystal, precious stones, hair of animals, wool, and many other bodies; and the name. of resinous to that which is produced by exciting resinous

resin

elec

trici

bodies, such as amber, copal, gum-lac, silk, paper, thread, | sudden shock in his arms and breast, and thus established) and a number of other substances. The characteristic of the efficacy of the Leyden jar. those two electricities was, that a body with vitreous electricity attracted all bodies with resinous electricity, and repelled all bodies with vitreous electricity; while a body with resinous electricity attracted all bodies with vitreous electricity, and repelled all bodies with resinous electricity. Two electrified silk threads, for example, repel each other, and also two electrified woollen threads, but an electrified silk thread will attract an electrified woollen thread. Hence it is easy to determine whether any body possesses vitreous or resinous electricity. If it attracts an electrified silk thread, its electricity will be vitreous; if it repels it, it will be resinous.

Gray repeated and varied the experiments of Dufay, and made many new ones. Like Hawksbee and Dr Wall, he recognized the similarity between the phenomena of electricity and those of thunder and lightning; and he expresses a hope "that there may be found out a way to collect a greater quantity of electric fire, and consequently to increase the force of that power, which, by several of these experiments, si licet magnis componere parva, seems to be of the same nature with thunder and lightning."

The discoveries which we have now recounted began to rouse the activity of the German and Dutch philosophers. To the electrical machine used by Newton and Hawksbee, Professor Boze of Wittenberg added the prime conductor, which at first consisted of an iron or tin tube supported by a man standing upon cakes of rosin; but it was afterwards suspended by silken strings. Professor Winkler of Leipsic substituted a cushion in place of the hand for exciting the revolving globe; and Professor Gordon of Erfurt, a Scotch Benedictine monk, first used a glass cylinder, eight inches long and four broad, which he caused to revolve by means of a bow and string. By these means electrical sparks of great size and intensity were produced, and by their aid various combustible substances, both fluid and solid, were inflamed. In 1744 M. Ludolph of Berlin succeeded in firing, by the electrical spark, the ethereal spirit of Frobenius. Winkler did the same by a spark from his finger; and he succeeded in inflaming French brandy and other weaker spirits after they had been heated. Gordon kindled spirits by a jet of electrified water. Dr Miles inflamed phosphorus by the electric spark; and oil, pitch, and sealing-wax, when strongly heated, were set on fire by similar means. We refer the student for lists of the works of the philosophers just mentioned to the admirable bibliography given by Young, Natural Philosophy, p. 515.

These striking effects were all produced by the electricity obrained immediately from an excited electric; but a great step was now made in the science by the discovery of a method of accumulating and preserving electricity in large quantities. The author of this great invention is not distinctly known; but there is reason to believe that a monk of the name of Kleist, a person of the name of Cuneus, and Professor Muschenbroeck of Leyden had each the merit of an independent inventor. The invention by which this Accumulation was effected was called the Leyden Jar or Phial, because it was principally in Leyden that it was either invented or tried. Having observed that excited electrics soon lost their electricity in the open air, and that their loss was accelerated when the atmosphere was charged with moisture or other conducting materials, Muschenbroeck conceived that the electricity of bodies might be retained by surrounding them with bodies which did not conduct it. In putting this idea to the test of experiment, he electrifed some water in a glass bottle, and a communication having been made between the water and the prime condactor, the assistant, who was holding the bottle, on trying to disengage the communicating wire, received a

Watson

Sir William Watson made some important experiments sir Wm. at this period of our history (Memoirs in Phil. Trans., (1715 about 1747). He succeeded in firing gunpowder by the 8072 electric spark; and by mixing the gunpowder with a little camphor he discharged a musket by the same power. He also fired hydrogen by the electric spark; and he kindled both spirits of wine and hydrogen by means of a drop of cold water, and even with ice. In the German exper ments the fluid or solid to be inflamed was set on fire by an electrified body; but Sir William Watson placed the fluid in the hands of an electrified person, and set it on fire by causing a person not electrified to touch it with his finger. Sir William Watson first observed the flash of light which attends the discharge of the Leyden phial, aud it is to him that we owe the pres improved form of the Leyden phial, in which it is coated both without and within with tinfoil. Dr Bevis indeed had suggested the outside! coating, and at Smeaton's recommendation, he coated a pane of glass on both sides, and within an inch of the edge, with tinfoil; but still the idea of coating the jar doubly belongs to Sir William Watson.

ments

Society.

A party of the Royal Society, with the president at their head, and Sir William Watson as their chief operator, entered upon a series of magnificent experiments, for the Exper purpose of determining the velocity of the electric fluid, the and the distance to which it could be conveyed. The Royal French savans had conveyed the influence of the Leyden jar through a circuit of 12,000 feet; and in one case the basin at the Tuileries, containing about an acre of water, formed part of the circuit; but the English philosophers made a more complete series of experiments, of which tho following were the results :

1. That in all their operations, when the wires have been properly conducted, the electrical commotions from the charged phial have been very considerable only when the observers at the extremities of the wire have touched some substance readily conducting elec tricity with some part of their bodies.

2. That the electrical commotion is always felt most sensibly in those parts of the bodies of the observers which are between the conducting wires and the nearest and the most non-electric substance, or, in other words, so much of their bodies as comes within! the electrical circuit.

3. That on these considerations we infer that the electrical power) is conducted between these observers by any non-electric substances which happen to be situated between them, and contribute to form the electrical circuit.

4. That the electrical commotion has been perceptible to two or inore observers at considerable distances from each other, even as far as two miles.

miles of wire, we infer that the electrical circuit is four miles, viz.

5. That when the observers have been shocked at the end of twe

two miles of wire, and the space of two miles of the non-electric matter between the observers, whether it bo water, earth, or both. 6. That the electrical commotion is equally strong, whether it is conducted by water or dry ground.

7. That if the wires between the electrifying machine and the observers are conducted on dry sticks, or other substances nonelectric in a slight degree only, the effects of the electrical power are much greater than when the wires in their progress touch the ground, or moist vegetables, or other substances in a great degree 4

non-electric.

8. That by comparing the respective velocities of electricity and sound, that of electricity, in any of the distances yet experienced, is nearly instantaneous.

In the following year these experiments were resumed with the view of ascertaining the absolute velocity of electricity at a certain distance, and it was found that through the whole length of a wire 12,276 feet the velocity of electricity was instantaneous."

The theory of positive and negative electricity which was afterwards elaborated by Franklin, was distinctly announced by Sir W. Watson. He lays it down as a law that in elec trical operations there is an afflux of "electric fluid " to the globe and the conductor, and also an efflux of the samel

Franklin (1706

[ocr errors]

matter from them. In the case of two insulated persons,
the one in contact with the rubber and the other with the
'conductor, he observed that either of them would communi-
cate a much stronger spark to the other than to any by
stander. The electricity of the one, he says, became more
rare than it is naturally, and that of the other more dense,
so that the density of the electricity in the two insulated
persons differed more than that between either of them and
a bystander.

A variety of interesting experiments were made about
this time by Le Monnier, Nollet, Winckler, Ellicott,
Jallabert, Boze, Menon, Smeaton, and Miles. In 1746
Le Monnier confirmed the result previously obtained by
Gray, that electricity is communicated to homogeneous
bodies in proportion to their surfaces only. Boze dis-
covered that capillary tubes which discharged water by
drops afforded a continuous stream when electrified. The
Abbé Nollet (Essai sur l'Electricité, 1746; Recherches,
1749; Lettres, 1753), the friend and coadjutor of Dufay,
a certained that electricity increases the natural evapora-
tion of fluids, and that the evaporation is hastened by
placing them in non-electric vessels. Jallabert confirmed
the result previously obtained by Watson, that electricity
passes through the substance of a conducting wire, and
not along its surface. Smeaton found that the red hot
part of an iron bar could be as strongly electrified as the
cold parts on each side of it. Dr Miles kindled com-
mon spirits by a stick of black sealing-wax excited by
dry flannel. Ellicott conceived that the particles of the
electric fluid repel each other, while they attract those
of all other bodies. Mowbray concluded that the vege-
tation of two myrtles was hastened by electrifying them,
a result which Nollet confirmed in the case of vegetating
seeds. The Abbé Menon found that cats, pigeons, spar-
rows, and chaffinches lost weight by being electrified
for five or six hours, and that the same result was true of
the human body; and hence it was concluded that electri-
city augments the insensible perspiration of animals.

A high place in the history of electricity must be
allotted to the name of Dr Benjamin Franklin of Phila-
delphia. His researches did much to extend our theoreti-
cal and practical knowledge of electricity, and the clearness
and vigour of his style made his writings popular, and
spread the study of the subject.

One of the first labours of the American philosophen
was to present, in a more distinct form, the theory of posi-
tive and negative electricity, which Sir W. Watson had
been the first to suggest. He showed that electricity is
not created by friction, but merely collected from its state
of diffusion through other matter by which it is attracted.
He asserted that the glass globe, when rubbed, attracted
the electrical fire, and took it from the rubber, the same
globe being disposed, when the friction ceases, to give out
its electricity to any body which has less. In the case of
the charged Leyden jar, the inner coating of tinfoil had
received more than its ordinary quantity of electricity,
and was therefore electrified positively or plus, while the
outer coating of tinfoil having had its ordinary quantity of
electricity diminished, was electrified negatively or minus.
Hence the cause of the shock and spark when the jar is
discharged, or when the superabundant plus electricity of
the inside is transferred by a conducting body to the de-
fective or minus electricity of the outside.
This theory
of the Leyden phial Franklin established in the clearest
manner, by showing that the outside and the inside coat-
ing possessed opposite electricities, and that, in charging
it, exactly as much electricity is added on one side as is
subtracted from the other. The abundant discharge of
electricity by points was observed by Franklin in his ear-
Liest experiments, and also the power of points to conduct

it copiously from an electrified body. Hence he was furnished with a simple method of collecting electricity from other bodies; and he was thus enabled to perform those remarkable experiments which we shall now proceed to explain. Hawksbee, Wall, and Nollet had successively suggested the similarity between lightning and the electric spark, and between the artificial snap and the natural thunder. Previous to the year 1750 Franklin drew up a statement, in which he showed that all the general phenomena and effects which were produced by electricity had their counterpart in lightning. After waiting some time for the erection of a spire at Philadelphia, by means of which he thought to bring down the electricity of a thunder-storm, he conceived the idea of sending up a kite among the clouds themselves. With this view he made a small cross of two small light strips of cedar, the arms being sufficiently long to reach to the four corners of a large thin silk handkerchief when extended. The corners of the handkerchief were tied to the extremities of the cross, and when the body of the kite was thus formed, a tail, loop, and string were added to it. The body was made of silk to enable it to bear the violence and wet of a thunder-storm. A very sharp pointed wire was fixed at the top of the upright stick of the cross, so as to rise a foot or more above the wood. A silk ribbon was tied to the end of the twine next the hand, and a key suspended at the junction of the twine and silk. In company with his son, Franklin raised the kite like a common one, in the first thunder-storm, which happened in the month of June 1752. To keep the silk ribbon dry, he stood within a door, taking care that the twine did not touch the frame of the door; and when the thunder-clouds came over the kite he watched the state of the string. A cloud passed without any electrical indications, and he began to despair of success. He saw, however, the loose filaments of the twine standing out every way, and he found them to be attracted by the approach of his finger. The suspended key gave a spark on the application of his knuckle, and when the string had become wet with the rain, the electricity became abundant; a Leyden jar was charged at the key, and by the electric fire thus obtained spirits were inflamed, and all the other electrical experiments performed which had been formerly made by excited electrics. In subsequent trials with another apparatus, he found that the clouds were sometimes positively and sometimes negatively electrified, and so demonstrated the perfect identity of lightning and electricity. Having thus succeeded in drawing the electric fire from the clouds, Franklin conceived the idea of protecting buildings from lightning by erecting on their highest parts pointed iron wire or conductors communicating with the ground. The electricity of a hovering or a passing cloud would thus be carried off slowly and silently; and if the cloud was highly charged, the lightning would strike in preference the elevated conductors.

The most important of Franklin's electrical writings are his Experiments and Observations on Electricity made at Philadelphia, 1751-54; his Letters on Electricity, and various memoirs and letters, Phil. Trans., 1756, 1760, &c

About the same time that Franklin was making his kite experiment in America, D'Alibard and others in France had erected a long iron rod at Marli, and obtained results agreeing with those of Franklin. Similar investigations were pursued by many others, among whom Father Beccaria deserves especial mention.

These experiments were often dangerous, and in one case Des a fatal accident occurred. Professor Richman of St Peters-Ric burg had erected on his house an iron rod to collect the 175 electricity of thunder-clouds. On the 6th August 1753,) during a thunder-storm, he was observing, along with his friend Sokolow, the indications of an electrometer which

Conton (7713

forined part of his apparatus, when a tremendous thunder-ing being then drawn out of the other, they appeared inore clap burst over the neighbourhood. Richman bent to ob serve the electrometer; while in this position, his head being a foot from the iron rod, Sokolow saw a globe of bluish fire about the size of the fist shoot from the iron rod to the professor's head, with a report like that of a pistol. The shock was fatal; Richman fell back upon a chest and instantly expired. Sokolow was stupified and benumbed, and the red hot fragments of a metallic wire struck his clothes, and covered them with burnt marks.

One of the most diligent labourers in the field of electrical science was an Englishman, John Canton (Phil. Trans., 1753-54). Before his time it had been assumed as indisputable that the same kind of electricity was invariably produced by the friction of the same electric,-that glass, for example, yielded always vitreous, and amber always resinous electricity. Having roughened a glass tube by grinding its surface with emery and sheet lead, he found that it possessed vitreous or positive electricity when excited with oiled silk, but resinous electricity when excited with new dannel He found, in short, that vitreous or resinous electricity might, in certain cases, be developed at will in the same tube, by altering the surfaces of the tube and the exciting rubber. Removing the polish from one half of the tube, he excited the different electricities with the same rubber at a single stroke, and, curiously enough, the rubber was found to move much more easily over the rough than over the polished half. Canton likewise discovered that glass, ainber, sealing-wax, and calcarcous spar were all electrified positively when taken out of mercury; and hence he was led to the important practical discovery that an amalgam of mercury and tin was most efficacious in exciting glass when applied to the surface of the rubber. Canton discovered, and to a certain extent explained by the then prevalent theory of "electrical atmospheres," the fundamental fact of electrification by induction. He also found that the air in a room could be electrified positively or negatively, and might remain thus electrified for a considerable time.

Beccaria, a celebrated Italian physicist, kept up the spirit of electrical discovery in Italy. He showed that water is a very imperfect conductor of electricity, that its conducting power is proportional to its quantity, and that a small quantity of water opposes a powerful resistance to the passage of electricity. He succeeded in making the electric spark visible in water, by discharging shocks through wires that nearly met in tubes filled with water. In this experiment the tubes, though sometimes eight or ten lines thick, were burst in pieces. Beccaria likewise demonstrated that air adjacent to an electrified body gradually acquired the same electricity, that the electricity of the body is diminished by that of the air, and that the air parts with its electricity very slowly. He considered that there was a mutual repulsion between the particles of the electric fluid and those of air, and that in the passage of the former through the latter a temporary vacuum was formed. Beccaria's experiments on atmospherical electricity are of the greatest interest to the meteorologist. For farther account of his work, see his Lettere dell Elettr., 1758; Experimenta, 1772; and letters, &c., in Phil. Trans. about 1770.

The science of electricity owes several practical as well as theoretical observations to Robert Symmer (Phil. Trans., about 1759). In pulling off his stockings in the even ing, he had often remarked that they not only gave a trackling noise, but even emitted sparks in the dark. The electricity was most powerful when a silk and a worsted stocking had been worn on the same leg, and it was best exhibited by putting the hand between the leg and the stockings, and pulling them off together. The one stock.

or less inflated, and exhibited the attractions and repulsions of electrified bodies. Two white silk stockings, or two black ones, when put on the same leg and taken off, gave no electrical indications. When a black and a white stock-' ing were put on the same leg, and after ten minutes taken off, they were so much inflated when pulled asunder, that cach showed the entire shape of the leg, and at the dis tance of a foot and a half they rushed to meet each other.

"But what appears most extraordinary is, that when they are separated, and removed at a certain distance from each other, their electricity does not appear to have been in the least impaired by the shock they had in meeting. They are again inflated, again attract and repel, and are as ready to rush together as before." When this experiment is performed with two black stockings in one hand, and two white in the other, it exhibits a very curious spectacle;" the repulsion of those of the same colour, and the attraction of those of different colours, throws them into an agitation that is not un-1 entertaining, and makes them catch each at that of its opposite, colour, at a greater distance than one would expect. When allowed to come together, they all unite in one mass. When separated, they resume their former appearance, and admit of the repetition of the experiment as often as you please, till their electricity, gradually wasting, stands in need of being recruited.

Symmer likewise found that a Leyden jar could be charged by the stockings either positively or negatively, according as the wire from the neck of the jar was presented to the black or the white stocking. When the electricity of the white stocking was thrown into the jar, and then the electricity of the black one, or vice versa, the jar was not electrified at all. With the electricity of two stockings he charged the jar to such a degree that the shock from it reached both his elbows; and by means of the electricity of four silk stockings he kindled spirits of wine in a tea-spoon which he held in his hand, and the shock was at the same time felt from the elbows to tho breast. Symmer has the merit of having first maintained the theory of two distinct fluids, not independent of each other, as Dufay supposed them to be, but co-existent, and, by counteracting each other, producing all the phenomena of electricity. He conceived that when a body is said to be positively electrified, it is not simply that it is possessed of a larger share of electric matter than in a natural state, nor, when it is said to be negatively electrified, of a less; but that, in the former case, it is possessed of a larger portion of one kind of electricity, and in the latter, of a larger portion of the other; while a body, in its natural state, remains unelectrified, because there is an equal amount of the two everywhere within it.

Contemporary with Symmer were Delaval, Wilson, Cigna, Kinnersley, Wilcke, and Priestley (for the works of these electricians consult Young). Delaval found that the sides of vessels that were perfect conductors were nonconductors, and that animal and vegetable bodies lost their conducting power when reduced to ashes. Wilson concluded that when two electrics are rubbed together, the harder of the two is generally electrified positively and the other negatively, the electricities always being opposite." Cigna made many curious experiments by using silk ribbands in place of the silk stockings of Symmer. Kinnersley, the friend of Franklin, made some important experiments on the elongation and fusion of iron wires, when a strong charge was passed through them in a state of tension (Phil. Trans., 1763); he also experimented on the disruptive discharge in air. Wilcke brought to light many phenomena respecting the electrification produced by the melting of electric substances.

ejec

The pyro-electricity of minerals, or the faculty possessed Pyroby some minerals of becoming electric by heat, and of tricity of exhibiting negative and positive poles, now began to attract minerals, the notice of philosophers. There is reason to believe that the lyncurium of the ancients, which, according to

« AnteriorContinuar »