...any particle may be rightly termed a Disease-Germ two things must be proved concerning it, viz. : — first, that it is a living organism ; secondly, that...will produce the disease of which it is the germ. Now there is only one disease affecting the higher animals in respect of which any thing of this kind...

...that any particle may be rightly termed a disease-germ two things must be proved concerning it, viz., first, that it is a living organism ; secondly, that...will produce the disease of which it is the germ. Now there is only one disease affecting the higher animals in respect of which anything of this kind...

...any particle may be rightly termed a Disease-Germ two things must be proved concerning it, viz. : — first, that it is a living organism ; secondly, that...will produce the disease of which it is the germ. Now there is only one disease affecting the higher animals in respect of which any thing of this kind...

...healthy person consists of minute organisms called ' disease germs.' In order that any particle may he rightly termed a disease germ, two things must be...germ." (Proc. Roy. Soc., Nov. 22d, 1877, No. 184, p. 122). In quoting this, I do not wish to express agreement in so strict a limitation of the words "...

...ultramicroscopical. As to the bearing of this discussion on the question of the germ theory, after saying that, "in order that any particle may be rightly termed...will produce the disease of which it is the germ," Dr. Sanderson, replying to Prof. Tyndall, in the Proceedings of the Royal Society, No. 184, Nov. 22,...

...that any particle may be rightly termed a disease-germ two things must be proved concerning it, viz., first, that it is a living organism ; secondly, that...will produce the disease of which it is the germ. Now there is only one disease affecting the higher animals in respect of which anything of this kind...