...purpose, and is not comprised in the general powers arid jurisdiction of the court. It is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a supreme court but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing s\\a\\ be intended...

...Dairies, 1 Ld. Raym. „/" 796., and Winford v. Powell, ibid. 1310., vis. that nothing shall MDNKLEY. be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...

...stated ; and, secondly, whether, if they are so, they support the pleas. It is an established rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so, nor any thing within the jurisdiction of an inferior court but...

...has exceeded its own jurisdiction, unless it is apparent that it has done so. Aтm. 10 Mod. 71. 4. Nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court but that which specially appears to be so ; but, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...

...statute, as upon the authority of that well known and established legal maxim, in l Sand. (Wms.) 74 a, " that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior Court, but that which specially appears to be so." Mr. Justice Botanquet said, " The real question here is, hat...

...inquiry. Ruddock v. Smith, 1 Dowl. 467. *CHAFTER VI. PLEAS TO THE JURISDICTION. IT is a general rule, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so ; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...

...stated merely that the Judge had issued the summon*, it would be enough. " The rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior (a) 5 M.Sf S. 248. (6) 7 QB 543. (c) Note to Colder v. Hatket, 3 Moore, Pr. CC36. XII. VICTORIA.] court,...

...William* v. Germaine, 7 B. & C. 468.) The rule of pleading the jurisdiction of Inferior Courts is, "that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a Superior but that which specially appears to be so : and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...

...expressed thus :—" The old rule I ordinary courts are bound to obey the process delifor jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of the Superior Courts but that which specially appears to be so ; nothing islntended to be within the...

...is bad in an inferior court, as it has been oftentimes adjudged. And the rule for jurisdiction is, that nothing shall be intended to be out of the jurisdiction of a superior court, but that which specially appears to be so; and, on the contrary, nothing shall be intended to be within...