plain authorities from Scripture, fupporting that which ART. feems to be founded on the light of nature, we need XXIV. go no further to prove that which is mainly defigned by this Article. p. 402. The cuftom of the primitive Church is no lefs clear in this point. As the Chriftian religion was fpread to different nations, fo they all worshipped God in their own tongue. The Syriac, the Greek, and the Latin, were indeed of that extent, that we have no particular hiftory of any Churches that lay beyond the compafs of those fanguages; but there was the fame reafon for putting the worthip of God in other languages, that there was for thefe: that which is drawn from the three languages, in which the title on our Saviour's crofs was written, is too trifling a thing to deferve an answer; as if a humour of Pilate's were to be confidered as a prophetical warrant, what he did being only defigned to make that title to be understood by all who were then at Jerufalem. There Cont. Celare very large paffages both in Origen and St. Bafil, fum, 1. 8. which mention every tongue's praifing of God; and that Ep.63. ad the Gospel being spread to many nations, he was in every Neocef. nation praised in the language of that nation. This continued fo long to be the practice even of the Latin Church, that in the ninth century, when the Slavons were converted, it was confidered at Rome by Pope John VIII. in Johan. 8. what language they fhould be allowed to worship God. Ep. 247. And, as it is pretended, a voice was heard, Let every tongue confefs to God; upon which that Pope wrote both to the Prince, and to the Bishop of the Slavons, allowing them to have their public fervice in their own tongue. But in the other parts of the Western Church, the Latin tongue continued to be fo univerfally understood by almost all forts of people, till the tenth or eleventh century, that there was no occafion for changing it; and by that time the Clergy were affecting to keep the people in ignorance, and in a blind dependance upon themfelves; and fo were willing to make them think that the whole business of reconciling the people to God lay upon them, and that they were to do it for them. A great part of the fervice of the mafs was faid fo low, that even they who underftood fome Latin could not be the better for it, in an age in which there was no printing, and fo few copies were to be had of the public offices. The Scriptures were likewife kept from the people, and the fervice of God was filled with many rites, in all which the Clergy feemed to defign, to make the people believe that thefe were facred charms, of which they only had the fecret. So that all the edification A a Concil. tom. 9. ART. edification which was to be had in the public worship was XXIV. turned to pomp and fhow, for the diverfion and entertainment of the fpectators. Chap. 8. In defence of this worship in an unknown tongue, the main argument that is brought is the authority and infallibility of the Church, which has appointed it; and Con. Trid. fince the ought to be fuppofed not to have erred, therefore this must be believed to be lawful. We are not much moved with this, especially with the authority of the later ages; fo the other arguments must be confidered, which indeed can scarce be called arguments. The modern tongues change fo faft, that they fay, if the worship were in them, it must either be often changed, or the phrases would grow old, and found harfhly. A few alterations once in an age will fet this matter right; befides, that the ufe of fuch forms does fix a language, at least as to those phrases that are used in it, which grow to be so familiar to our ears by conftant ufe, that they do not fo eafily wear out. It is above eighty years fince the present tranflation of the Bible was made, and above one hundred and forty fince our Liturgy was compiled, and yet we perceive no uncouthness in the phrafes. The fimplicity, in which fuch forms must be drawn, makes them not fo fubject to alteration as other compofures, of rhetoric or poetry; but can it be thought any inconveniency now and then to alter a little the words or phrases of our service? Much lefs can that be thought of weight enough to balance the vafter prejudice of keeping whole nations in ignorance, and of extinguishing devotion by entertaining it with a form of worthip that is not understood? Nor can this.be avoided by faying, that the people are furnished with forms in their own language, into which the greatest part of the public offices are tranflated: for as this is not done but fince the Reformation began, and in those nations only where the fcandal that is given by an unknown language might have, as they apprehend, ill effects; fo it is only an artifice to keep thofe ftill in their communion, whom fuch a grofs practice, if not thus difguifed, might otherwife drive from them. But ftill the public worship has no edification in it; nor can thofe who do not understand it fay Amen, according to St. Paul. Finally, they urge the communion of Saints, in order to which they think it is neceffary that Priests, wherefoever they go, may be able to officiate, which they cannot do if every nation worships God in its own language. And this was indeed very neceffary in those ages in which the See of Rome did by provifions, and the other other inventions of the Canonifts, difpofe of the best be- ART. nefices to their own creatures and fervants. That trade XXIV. would have been spoiled, if ftrangers might not have been admitted till they had learned the language of the country; and thus, inftead of taking care of the people that ought to be edified by the public worship, provifion was made at their coft for fuch vagrant Priefts as have been in all ages the fcandals of the Church, and the reproaches of Religion. ARTICLE XXV. Of the Sacraments. Sacraments ordained of Chrift be not onlp Badges oz Tokens of Chriftian Hen's Pzofellion, but rathez thep be certain fuze Witnelles, and effeaual Signs of Grace, and God's Will towards us, by the which he doth work inviably in us, and doth not only quicken, but also frengthen and confirm ou? Faith in him. There are Two Satzaments ordained of Christ our Lord in the Gospel; that is to fap, Baptism, and the Supper of the Lord. Those five commonly called Sacraments, that is to fay, Confirmation, Penance, Diders, Matrimony, and extzeme Untion, are not to be counted for Sacraments of the Gospel; being fuch as have grown partly of the corrupt following of the Apoftles, partly are States of Life allowed in the Schipe tuzes, but pet have not like Natuze of Sacraments with Baptism, and the Lozd's Supper; for that they have not any viüible Sign oz Ceremony ordained of God. The Sacraments weze nat ordained of Chziff to be gazed upon, or to be carried about, but that we Chould duly use them. And in fuch only as worthily receive the fame they have a wholesome Cffea or Operation; but they that receive them unworthily, puzchase to themselves Damnation, as St. Paul faith. HERE is a great diverfity between the form of this Article, as it is now fettled, and that published by King Edward, which begun in thefe words: Our Lord Jefus Chrift gathered his people into a fociety by Sacraments, very few in number, moft easily to be kept, and of most excellent fignification; that is to Jay, Baptifm, and the Supper of the Lord. There is nothing in that edition instead of the paragraph concerning the other five pretended Sacraments. Next comes the paragraph which is here the last, only with the addition of thefe words after operation: Not as fome fay, ex opere operato, which terms, as they are Jirange 357 XXV. Strange and utterly unknown to the Holy Scripture, fo do they ART. It was moft natural to begin this Article with a de- There are two extremes to be avoided in this matter. The one is of the Church of Rome, that teaches, that as fome Sacraments imprint a character upon the foul, which they define to be a physical quality, that is, super natural |