Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-analytic PhilosophyNorthwestern University Press, 1969 - 280 páginas |
Contenido
Introduction The Battle of the Books Renewed | 3 |
A Logic That Cant Say What Anything Is | 26 |
A WhatLogic and | 42 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 11 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-Analytic Philosophy Henry B. Veatch Vista previa limitada - 2023 |
Two Logics: The Conflict Between Classical and Neo-analytic Philosophy Henry Babcock Veatch Vista de fragmentos - 1969 |
Términos y frases comunes
A. N. Whitehead Accordingly Aeschylus analytic philosophy analytic truths analytic-synthetic distinction answer argument Aristotelian Aristotle assert bare particular behavior Bertrand Russell bodies are extended C. I. Lewis causes Chapter character concept concerned consider construed context contrast covering law determined distinction Dray edible apple entities everyday example experience explanandum formal function given historical explanation human humanistic Hume Ibid induction inference involved judgments Kant Kant's kind language game least Leibniz Lewis linguistic logical atomism logical deducibility logician logimilk means ment merely metaphysics modern logician Moreover motion necessary truth objects ontological ourselves particular perhaps philosophical physical bodies planets PM logic Popper possible predicate principle proper properties propositions question reason recognize regard relating-logic relation respect rules Russell scientific knowledge scientists sense simply sort statement subject-predicate substance suppose surely synthetic things tion transcendental true understanding universal Waismann what-logic what-statements Wittgenstein words